Literature DB >> 16280544

No evidence for tissue-specific adaptation of synonymous codon usage in humans.

Marie Sémon1, Jean R Lobry, Laurent Duret.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that the synonymous codon usage of human tissue-specific genes was under selective pressure to modulate the expression of proteins by codon-mediated translational control (Plotkin, J. B., H. Robins, and A. J. Levine. 2004. Tissue-specific codon usage and the expression of human genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:12588-12591.) To test this model, we analyzed by internal correspondence analysis the codon usage of 2,126 human tissue-specific genes expressed in 18 different tissues. We confirm that synonymous codon usage differs significantly between the tissues. However, the effect is very weak: the variability of synonymous codon usage between tissues represents only 2.3% of the total codon usage variability. Moreover, this variability is directly linked to isochore-scale (>100 kb) variability of GC-content that affect both coding and introns or intergenic regions. This demonstrates that variations of synonymous codon usage between tissue-specific genes expressed in different tissues are due to regional variations of substitution patterns and not to translational selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16280544     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  36 in total

1.  Gene expression, nucleotide composition and codon usage bias of genes associated with human Y chromosome.

Authors:  Monisha Nath Choudhury; Arif Uddin; Supriyo Chakraborty
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Mutational bias is the driving force for shaping the synonymous codon usage pattern of alternatively spliced genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.).

Authors:  Qingpo Liu; Haichao Hu; Hong Wang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Evolutionary rate and gene expression across different brain regions.

Authors:  Tamir Tuller; Martin Kupiec; Eytan Ruppin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Viral adaptation to host: a proteome-based analysis of codon usage and amino acid preferences.

Authors:  Iris Bahir; Menachem Fromer; Yosef Prat; Michal Linial
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 11.429

5.  Fine-tuning translation kinetics selection as the driving force of codon usage bias in the hepatitis A virus capsid.

Authors:  Lluís Aragonès; Susana Guix; Enric Ribes; Albert Bosch; Rosa M Pintó
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 6.823

6.  A general model of codon bias due to GC mutational bias.

Authors:  Gareth A Palidwor; Theodore J Perkins; Xuhua Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Universal function-specificity of codon usage.

Authors:  Hamed Shateri Najafabadi; Hani Goodarzi; Reza Salavati
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Translation efficiency in humans: tissue specificity, global optimization and differences between developmental stages.

Authors:  Yedael Y Waldman; Tamir Tuller; Tomer Shlomi; Roded Sharan; Eytan Ruppin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Differential selective constraints shaping codon usage pattern of housekeeping and tissue-specific homologous genes of rice and arabidopsis.

Authors:  Pamela Mukhopadhyay; Surajit Basak; Tapash Chandra Ghosh
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Computational identification of rare codons of Escherichia coli based on codon pairs preference.

Authors:  Xianming Wu; Songfeng Wu; Dong Li; Jiyang Zhang; Lin Hou; Jie Ma; Wanlin Liu; Daming Ren; Yunping Zhu; Fuchu He
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.