Literature DB >> 16280275

Cardiovascular outcome in treated hypertensive patients with responder, masked, false resistant, and true resistant hypertension.

Sante D Pierdomenico1, Domenico Lapenna, Anna Bucci, Roberta Di Tommaso, Rocco Di Mascio, Bianca M Manente, Maria P Caldarella, Matteo Neri, Franco Cuccurullo, Andrea Mezzetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cardiovascular outcome in apparently responder hypertensive patients with responder and masked hypertension, and in apparently resistant hypertensive patients with false and true resistant hypertension.
METHODS: The occurrence of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events was evaluated in 340 patients with responder hypertension (clinic blood pressure [BP] <140/90 mm Hg and daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg), 126 with masked hypertension (clinic BP <140/90 mm Hg and daytime BP >135 or 85 mm Hg), 146 with false resistant hypertension (clinic BP >or=140 or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP <135/85 mm Hg), and 130 with true resistant hypertension (clinic BP >or=140 or 90 mm Hg and daytime BP >135 or 85 mm Hg).
RESULTS: During follow-up period (4.98 +/- 2.9 years), the event-rate per 100 patient-years was 0.87, 2.42, 1.2, and 4.1 in patients with responder, masked, false resistant, and true resistant hypertension, respectively. After adjustment for several covariates, including clinic BP (forced into the model), Cox regression analysis showed that cardiovascular risk was significantly higher in masked hypertension (masked versus responder hypertension, relative risk [RR] 2.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-4.7, P < .05) and in true resistant hypertension (true resistant versus responder hypertension, RR 2.94, 95% CI 1.02-8.41, P < .05), whereas there was no significant difference between false resistant and responder hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients with masked hypertension are at higher risk than those with responder hypertension, and that those with false resistant hypertension are at lower risk than those with true resistant hypertension. Ambulatory BP monitoring should be performed in treated hypertensive patients to obtain a better prognostic stratification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16280275     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  117 in total

1.  Incidence and prognosis of resistant hypertension in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Stacie L Daugherty; J David Powers; David J Magid; Heather M Tavel; Frederick A Masoudi; Karen L Margolis; Patrick J O'Connor; Joe V Selby; P Michael Ho
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prevalence and determinants of white coat effect in a large UK hypertension clinic population.

Authors:  O Thomas; K E Shipman; K Day; M Thomas; U Martin; I Dasgupta
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 3.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Management of Resistant Hypertension: Still a Matter of our Resistance?

Authors:  Antonios A Lazaridis; Pantelis A Sarafidis; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Masked hypertension: a common but insidious presentation of hypertension.

Authors:  D W McKay; Martin G Myers; Peter Bolli; Arun Chockalingam
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 5.  New drugs for hypertension: what do they offer?

Authors:  Alan H Gradman; Yoel Vivas
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  Refractory hypertension: determination of prevalence, risk factors, and comorbidities in a large, population-based cohort.

Authors:  David A Calhoun; John N Booth; Suzanne Oparil; Marguerite R Irvin; Daichi Shimbo; Daniel T Lackland; George Howard; Monika M Safford; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 7.  Job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Paul A Landsbergis; Marnie Dobson; George Koutsouras; Peter Schnall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Apparent and true resistant hypertension: definition, prevalence and outcomes.

Authors:  E Judd; D A Calhoun
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring among Medicare beneficiaries in 2007-2010.

Authors:  Daichi Shimbo; Shia T Kent; Keith M Diaz; Lei Huang; Anthony J Viera; Meredith Kilgore; Suzanne Oparil; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-09-18

10.  Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; David A Calhoun; George L Bakris; Robert D Brook; Stacie L Daugherty; Cheryl R Dennison-Himmelfarb; Brent M Egan; John M Flack; Samuel S Gidding; Eric Judd; Daniel T Lackland; Cheryl L Laffer; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Steven M Smith; Sandra J Taler; Stephen C Textor; Tanya N Turan; William B White
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 10.190

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.