Literature DB >> 16279999

Do patients show the same level of adherence with all dry powder inhalers?

H Chrystyn1.   

Abstract

Poor adherence with inhaled therapy presents a considerable problem. In the UK, non-adherence is estimated to occur in 10-46% of those prescribed inhaled corticosteroids and may contribute to an estimated 18-48% of asthma deaths. Before dry powder inhalers can be considered interchangeable, it is important to check that adherence is unaffected by any switching of the device dispensed to patients. Numerous studies have shown that adherence with inhaled medication is a multifactorial issue. A number of evidence-based guidelines have concluded that there is no difference in the delivery of treatments from different inhaler devices. However, many studies comparing different devices are designed to show equivalence. It is therefore difficult to determine whether the studies on which the guidelines are based were conducted with treatments already being used at the top of a dose-response curve. Furthermore, studies use selected patient populations who consent to take part and consequently receive regular contact with healthcare professionals, with emphasis on using the correct inhaler technique and on compliance. These studies do not therefore necessarily reflect real life. It is possible that patient preferences or perceptions of differences in efficacy are behind complaints when devices are switched. Patients vary in their preference for different dry powder inhalers, as shown in numerous studies of patient attitudes. There is evidence to indicate that patient claims of differences between inhalers that contain the same molecule from different manufacturers may have an objective basis. Healthcare professionals increasingly recognise the impact of patient attitudes on adherence. Accepting that patients make choices about their therapy is an integral part of achieving the partnership in management recommended by guidelines. The most effective treatment will not achieve disease control if it is not used or if it is used incorrectly. It may be short-sighted to change a device that a patient has chosen to one that is just given without consent, as this may result in poor adherence to therapy with consequent loss of control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16279999     DOI: 10.1111/j.1368-504X.2005.00723.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract Suppl        ISSN: 1368-504X


  16 in total

1.  Management and control of asthma in patients attending a specialist centre in oman.

Authors:  Omar A Al-Rawas; B Jayakrishnan; Fatma Ben Abid; Jojy George; Sawsan A Baddar; Bazdawi M Al-Riyami
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2009-06-30

2.  Survey of pharmacists' attitudes towards interchangeable use of dry powder inhalers.

Authors:  Angela E Williams; Henry Chrystyn
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2007-01-23

3.  Ease-of-use, preference, confidence, and satisfaction with Revolizer(®), a novel dry powder inhaler, in an Indian population.

Authors:  Sujeet K Rajan; Jaideep A Gogtay
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2014-10

4.  Inhalation errors due to device switch in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma: critical health and economic issues.

Authors:  Alessandro Roggeri; Claudio Micheletto; Daniela Paola Roggeri
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2016-03-21

5.  The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients.

Authors:  Roberto W Dal Negro; Massimiliano Povero
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-05-10

6.  Acceptability and preference of three inhalation devices assessed by the Handling Questionnaire in asthma and COPD patients.

Authors:  Roberto W Dal Negro; Massimiliano Povero
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2016-02-10

7.  Dry-powder inhalers in patients with persistent airflow limitation: usability and preference.

Authors:  Roberto W Dal Negro; Massimiliano Povero
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2016-09-05

Review 8.  The Diskus: a review of its position among dry powder inhaler devices.

Authors:  H Chrystyn
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Potential negative consequences of non-consented switch of inhaled medications and devices in asthma patients.

Authors:  U S Björnsdóttir; S Gizurarson; U Sabale
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 10.  Switching treatments in COPD: implications for costs and treatment adherence.

Authors:  Fulvio Braido; Federico Lavorini; Francesco Blasi; Ilaria Baiardini; Giorgio Walter Canonica
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2015-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.