Literature DB >> 16279504

Defining poor responders in assisted reproduction.

Hassan N Sallam1, Fathy Ezzeldin, Abdel-Fattah Agameya, Ashraf Farrag Rahman, Yehia El-Garem.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish an objective definition of "poor responders" for patients undergoing treatment with assisted reproduction.
METHODS: A total of 782 infertile couples treated with assisted reproduction were studied by retrospective analysis of the data. Simple linear regression was performed between the number of oocytes retrieved and the clinical pregnancy rate. The sensitivity and specificity were then calculated and the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn in order to determine a critical number of oocytes retrieved below which the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly diminished.
RESULTS: An excellent correlation was found between the number of oocytes retrieved and the clinical pregnancy rate (r = 0.90). The clinical pregnancy rate started to become significantly lower when fewer than 5, 6, and 8 oocytes were retrieved from patients treated with ICSI, IVF, or TeSE/ICSI, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The definition of poor responders in assisted reproduction depends on the treatment modality. Poor responders are patients undergoing treatment with ICSI, IVF, or TeSE/ICSI from whom fewer than 5, 6, or 8 oocytes are retrieved, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16279504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Fertil Womens Med        ISSN: 1534-892X


  4 in total

1.  Day 3 embryo transfer may have better pregnancy outcomes in younger than 35-year-old patients with poor ovarian response.

Authors:  Zhi-min Xin; Bin Xu; Hai-xia Jin; Wen-yan Song; Ying-pu Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  What number of oocytes is appropriate for defining poor ovarian response?

Authors:  Seul Ki Kim; Jung Ryeol Lee; Byung Chul Jee; Chang Suk Suh; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Rosalie Cabry-Goubet; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Aviva Devaux; Naima Belhadri-Mansouri; Henri Copin; Moncef Benkhalifa
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Prediction and diagnosis of poor ovarian response: the dilemma.

Authors:  Ahmed Badawy; Alaa Wageah; Mohamed El Gharib; Ezz Eldin Osman
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2011-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.