Literature DB >> 16279409

Taxonomic re-evaluation of Leptographium lundbergii based on DNA sequence comparisons and morphology.

Karin Jacobs1, Halvor Solheim, Brenda D Wingfield, Michael J Wingfield.   

Abstract

The genus Leptographium was described in 1927 and currently includes 48 species, with L. lundbergii as the type species. In recent years, the taxonomic status of L. lundbergii has not been uniformly agreed upon and it has been the topic of considerable debate. The problem was compounded by the absence of a type specimen, and the species was epitypified at a later stage. Unfortunately, the whereabouts of the epitype is now unknown. In 1983, Wingfield & Marasas described L. truncatum, which is morphologically similar to L. lundbergii. Based on DNA comparisons and similarities in their morphology, this fungus was reduced to synonymy with L. lundbergii. The loss of the type specimen as well as variation in the morphology of strains identified as L. lundbergii prompted us to re-examine the taxonomic status of this species. A number of strains from various geographic areas were studied. These include a strain of L. lundbergii deposited at CBS by Melin in 1929 (CBS 352.29) as well as the ex-type strain of L. truncatum. The strains were compared based on morphology and comparison of multiple gene sequences. Three genes or genic regions, ITS2 and part of the 28S gene, partial beta-tubulin and partial elongation factor 1-alpha were compared. Strains currently identified as L. lundbergii, represented a complex of species. Strains initially described as L. truncatum clustered separately from other L. lundbergii strains, could be distinguished morphologically and should be treated as a distinct taxon. L. lundbergii is provided with a new and expanded description based on a neotype designated for it. A third group was also identified as separate from the main L. lundbergii clade and had a distinct Hyalorhinocladiella-type anamorph, described here as H. pinicola sp. nov.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16279409     DOI: 10.1017/s0953756205003618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycol Res        ISSN: 0953-7562


  6 in total

1.  Generic boundaries in the Ophiostomatales reconsidered and revised.

Authors:  Z W de Beer; M Procter; M J Wingfield; S Marincowitz; T A Duong
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 25.731

2.  Diversity of Ophiostomatoid Fungi Associated with Dendroctonus armandi Infesting Pinus armandii in Western China.

Authors:  Huimin Wang; Tiantian Wang; Ya Liu; Fanyong Zeng; Haifeng Zhang; Cony Decock; Xingyao Zhang; Quan Lu
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22

3.  Eight new Leptographium species associated with tree-infesting bark beetles in China.

Authors:  D Paciura; Z W de Beer; K Jacobs; X D Zhou; H Ye; M J Wingfield
Journal:  Persoonia       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 11.051

4.  Identification of ophiostomatalean fungi associated with Tomicus pilifer infesting Pinus koraiensis in Northeastern China.

Authors:  Huimin Wang; Caixia Liu; Fangzheng Yue; Dong-Hui Yan; Quan Lu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  DNA sequence comparisons of Ophiostoma spp., including Ophiostoma aurorae sp. nov., associated with pine bark beetles in South Africa.

Authors:  Xudong Zhou; Z Wilhelm de Beer; Michael J Wingfield
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 16.097

6.  Multi-gene phylogenies define Ceratocystiopsis and Grosmannia distinct from Ophiostoma.

Authors:  Renate D Zipfel; Z Wilhelm de Beer; Karin Jacobs; Brenda D Wingfield; Michael J Wingfield
Journal:  Stud Mycol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 16.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.