Literature DB >> 16279136

Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.

Ian R White1, James Thomas.   

Abstract

The magnitude of the effect of an intervention on a quantitative outcome may be expressed as a standardized mean difference by dividing the difference in means by the standard deviation of the outcome. This is useful to compare outcomes measured using different scales, especially in meta-analysis. However, uncertainty about the standard deviation leads to complicated formulae to avoid bias and to compute the correct standard error. We review approximate and exact formulae and argue for the use of the exact formulae. We then extend the formulae to cluster-randomized trials, and show how the calculations may be implemented using published results. We also describe methods for estimating the standard deviation. Various pitfalls are identified which can lead to major errors especially in the cluster-randomized setting.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16279136     DOI: 10.1191/1740774505cn081oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  29 in total

1.  Prenatal micronutrient supplementation: are we there yet?

Authors:  Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Batool Azra Haider
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Occupational styrene exposure and acquired dyschromatopsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ariel R Choi; Joseph M Braun; George D Papandonatos; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Effects of hormonal growth promotants on beef quality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ian J Lean; Helen M Golder; Natasha M Lees; Peter McGilchrist; Jose E P Santos
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Attenuated psychotic symptom interventions in youth at risk of psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel J Devoe; Megan S Farris; Parker Townes; Jean Addington
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.732

5.  Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirsty Winkley; Rebecca Upsher; Daniel Stahl; Daniel Pollard; Architaa Kasera; Alan Brennan; Simon Heller; Khalida Ismail
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Designing clinical trials to test disease-modifying agents: application to the treatment trials of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Gerald van Belle; J Philip Miller; John C Morris
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  A meta-analysis of zilpaterol and ractopamine effects on feedlot performance, carcass traits and shear strength of meat in cattle.

Authors:  Ian J Lean; John M Thompson; Frank R Dunshea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of local anaesthetics for premature ejaculation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Dong Xia; You-Feng Han; Liu-Hua Zhou; Yun Chen; Yu-Tian Dai
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Ariel M Aloe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Allowing for informative missingness in aggregate data meta-analysis with continuous or binary outcomes: Extensions to metamiss.

Authors:  Anna Chaimani; Dimitris Mavridis; Julian P T Higgins; Georgia Salanti; Ian R White
Journal:  Stata J       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.