Nirav R Shah1, Jeff Borenstein, Robert W Dubois. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. nirav.shah@med.nyu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is a rapidly evolving debate on the indications and appropriate duration of therapy for postmenopausal hormone therapy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the specific relationships of postmenopausal estrogen therapy (ET), postmenopausal combined (estrogen-progestogen) hormone therapy (CHT), and the incidence of breast cancer. DESIGN: We performed computerized searches of MEDLINE and CancerLit through September 2003 and reviewed reference lists of retrieved studies and meta-analyses. We included English-language studies that identified noncontraceptive postmenopausal hormone use; reported on the risks of "current use" of ET and/or CHT and breast cancer incidence; were case-control, cohort, or experimental; and reported either an odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR), or HR with CIs. Two investigators were involved during all stages of study selection and independently extracted all data selected for inclusion in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 13 studies of ET and breast cancer (700,000 women) resulted in an OR of 1.16 (95% confidence limits [CL] 1.06, 1.28), with estimates for less than 5 years use 1.16 (1.02, 1.32) and more than 5 years use 1.20 (1.06, 1.37). Meta-analysis of eight studies of CHT and breast cancer (650,000 women) resulted in an OR of 1.39 (95% CL 1.12, 1.72), with estimates for less than 5 years use 1.35 (1.16, 1.57) and more than 5 years use 1.63 (1.22, 2.18). CONCLUSIONS: Data from observational studies support the association of increased but considerably different risks for breast cancer incidence among current users of ET and CHT. These represent the first pooled estimates for ET. CHT estimates correspond to those from randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: There is a rapidly evolving debate on the indications and appropriate duration of therapy for postmenopausal hormone therapy. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the specific relationships of postmenopausal estrogen therapy (ET), postmenopausal combined (estrogen-progestogen) hormone therapy (CHT), and the incidence of breast cancer. DESIGN: We performed computerized searches of MEDLINE and CancerLit through September 2003 and reviewed reference lists of retrieved studies and meta-analyses. We included English-language studies that identified noncontraceptive postmenopausal hormone use; reported on the risks of "current use" of ET and/or CHT and breast cancer incidence; were case-control, cohort, or experimental; and reported either an odds ratio (OR), relative risk (RR), or HR with CIs. Two investigators were involved during all stages of study selection and independently extracted all data selected for inclusion in meta-analyses. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 13 studies of ET and breast cancer (700,000 women) resulted in an OR of 1.16 (95% confidence limits [CL] 1.06, 1.28), with estimates for less than 5 years use 1.16 (1.02, 1.32) and more than 5 years use 1.20 (1.06, 1.37). Meta-analysis of eight studies of CHT and breast cancer (650,000 women) resulted in an OR of 1.39 (95% CL 1.12, 1.72), with estimates for less than 5 years use 1.35 (1.16, 1.57) and more than 5 years use 1.63 (1.22, 2.18). CONCLUSIONS: Data from observational studies support the association of increased but considerably different risks for breast cancer incidence among current users of ET and CHT. These represent the first pooled estimates for ET. CHT estimates correspond to those from randomized trials.
Authors: Janet R Daling; Kathleen E Malone; David R Doody; Lynda F Voigt; Leslie Bernstein; Ralph J Coates; Polly A Marchbanks; Sandra A Norman; Linda K Weiss; Giske Ursin; Jesse A Berlin; Ronald T Burkman; Dennis Deapen; Suzanne G Folger; Jill A McDonald; Michael S Simon; Brian L Strom; Phyllis A Wingo; Robert Spirtas Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Linda K Weiss; Ronald T Burkman; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Lynda F Voigt; Michael S Simon; Janet R Daling; Sandra A Norman; Leslie Bernstein; Giske Ursin; Polly A Marchbanks; Brian L Strom; Jesse A Berlin; Anita L Weber; David R Doody; Phyllis A Wingo; Jill A McDonald; Kathleen E Malone; Suzanne G Folger; Robert Spirtas Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: M I Whitehead; P T Townsend; J Pryse-Davies; T Ryder; G Lane; N Siddle; R J King Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1982-03-15 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Gaia Pocobelli; Polly A Newcomb; Christopher I Li; Linda S Cook; William E Barlow; Noel S Weiss Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Xin Grevers; Anne Grundy; Abbey E Poirier; Farah Khandwala; Matthew Feldman; Christine M Friedenreich; Darren R Brenner Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2016-12-12
Authors: Katherine W Reeves; Joel L Weissfeld; Francesmary Modugno; Brenda Diergaarde Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham Colditz; Heather Eliassen; Bernard Rosner; Aleksandra Gasparova; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 2.506