Literature DB >> 16278521

Efficacy of combination therapy for systolic blood pressure in patients with severe systolic hypertension: the Systolic Evaluation of Lotrel Efficacy and Comparative Therapies (SELECT) study.

Joel M Neutel1, David H G Smith, Michael A Weber, Lesley Schofield, Das Purkayastha, Marjorie Gatlin.   

Abstract

Systolic hypertension is predominant among patients over 50 years of age, is a more important cardiovascular risk factor than diastolic blood pressure, and is more difficult to control than diastolic blood pressure. Consequently, the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) recommends combination therapy as first-line treatment for patients with stage 2 hypertension. In the Systolic Evaluation of Lotrel Efficacy and Comparative Therapies (SELECT) study, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was used to identify patients with systolic hypertension and to determine the impact of 8 weeks of treatment with either amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl 5/20 mg combination therapy (n=149), amlodipine besylate 5 mg (n=146), or benazepril HCl 20 mg (n=148). Combination therapy was significantly more effective in reducing systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure than either monotherapy (p<0.0001). Significantly greater percentages of patients in the combination group compared with either monotherapy achieved blood pressure control (p<0.0001). Adverse events were low in all three treatment arms, with less peripheral edema in the combination group than in the amlodipine-treated group. The combination of amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl given to patients with stage 2 systolic hypertension resulted in significantly greater reductions in blood pressure and pulse pressure than those seen with monotherapy and was at least as well tolerated as the separate components. This data supports the recommendation of the JNC 7 for the use of combination therapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16278521      PMCID: PMC8109320          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.04615.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  27 in total

1.  Combination antihypertensive drugs: recommendations for use.

Authors:  N S Skolnik; J D Beck; M Clark
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 3.292

2.  Predominance of isolated systolic hypertension among middle-aged and elderly US hypertensives: analysis based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III.

Authors:  S S Franklin; M J Jacobs; N D Wong; G J L'Italien; P Lapuerta
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Does the relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk change with aging? The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  S S Franklin; M G Larson; S A Khan; N D Wong; E P Leip; W B Kannel; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Slowing the progression of renal disease in diabetic patients.

Authors:  E M Vivian; M L Goebig
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. A cooperative study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Prevention of heart failure by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors:  J B Kostis; B R Davis; J Cutler; R H Grimm; K G Berge; J D Cohen; C R Lacy; H M Perry; M D Blaufox; S Wassertheil-Smoller; H R Black; E Schron; D M Berkson; J D Curb; W M Smith; R McDonald; W B Applegate
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Treatment of patients with essential hypertension: amlodipine 5 mg/benazepril 20 mg compared with amlodipine 5 mg, benazepril 20 mg, and placebo.

Authors:  E Kuschnir; E Acuña; D Sevilla; J Vasquez; M Bendersky; J Resk; R Glazer
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Pilot study to evaluate a water displacement technique to compare effects of diuretics and ACE inhibitors to alleviate lower extremity edema due to dihydropyridine calcium antagonists.

Authors:  M R Weir; C Rosenberger; J C Fink
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Extent of cardiovascular risk reduction associated with treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.

Authors:  Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Rachel Wildman; Anne Newman; Lewis H Kuller
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003 Dec 8-22

10.  Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael Weber; Hans R Brunner; Steffan Ekman; Lennart Hansson; Tsushung Hua; John Laragh; Gordon T McInnes; Lada Mitchell; Francis Plat; Anthony Schork; Beverly Smith; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Should two-drug initial therapy for hypertension be recommended for all patients?

Authors:  Jennifer B Cowart; Addison A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension with amlodipine/valsartan for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne Oparil; Thomas Giles; Elizabeth O Ofili; Bertram Pitt; Yodit Seifu; Robert Hilkert; Rita Samuel; James R Sowers
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Control and management of hypertension at a university health centre in oman.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Almahrezi; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Ayman Al-Aamri; Samia Al-Khaldi; Nisrin Al-Zadjali; Mohammed Al-Hatali; Abdullah Al-Shukeili
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2008-07

4.  Prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension in primary care settings in Al seeb wilayat, oman.

Authors:  Rashid Al-Saadi; Sulaiman Al-Shukaili; Suleiman Al-Mahrazi; Zakiya Al-Busaidi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-08-15

Review 5.  More medications, fewer pills: combination medications for the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Richard Lewanczuk; Sheldon W Tobe
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Efficacy of fixed-dose amlodipine and losartan combination compared with amlodipine monotherapy in stage 2 hypertension: a randomized, double blind, multicenter study.

Authors:  Sung H Kim; Kyu H Ryu; Nam-Ho Lee; Jin-Ho Kang; Woo-Shik Kim; Sang-Weon Park; Hae-Young Lee; Jae-Joong Kim; Young-Keun Ahn; Soon Y Suh
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-10-28

Review 7.  Prompt, aggressive BP lowering in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Kenneth A Jamerson; Jan Basile
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  Risk-based classification of hypertension and the role of combination therapy.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Hypertension control in the elderly.

Authors:  Joel M Neutel; Lawrence I Gilderman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Fixed combination of lercanidipine and enalapril in the management of hypertension: focus on patient preference and adherence.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Francesca Santi
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.