PURPOSE: Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) occur in 50% of primary bladder tumors. An FGFR3 mutation is associated with good prognosis, illustrated by significantly lower percentage of patients with progression and disease-specific mortality. FGFR3 mutations are especially prevalent in low grade/stage tumors, with pTa tumors harboring mutations in 85% of the cases. These tumors recur in 70% of patients. Efficient FGFR3 mutation detection for prognostic purposes and for detection of recurrences in urine is an important clinical issue. In this paper, we describe a simple assay for the simultaneous detection of nine different FGFR3 mutations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The assay consists of one multiplex PCR, followed by extension of primers for each mutation with a labeled dideoxynucleotide. The extended primers are separated by capillary electrophoresis, and the identity of the incorporated nucleotide indicates the presence or absence of a mutation. RESULTS: The assay was found to be more sensitive than single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Mutations could still be detected with an input of only 1 ng of genomic DNA and in a 20-fold excess of wild-type DNA. Moreover, in urine samples from patients with a mutant tumor, the sensitivity of mutation detection was 62%. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a fast, easy to use assay for the simultaneous detection of FGFR3 mutations, which can be of assistance in clinical decision-making and as an alternative for the follow-up of patients by invasive cystoscopy for the detection of recurrences in urine.
PURPOSE: Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) occur in 50% of primary bladder tumors. An FGFR3 mutation is associated with good prognosis, illustrated by significantly lower percentage of patients with progression and disease-specific mortality. FGFR3 mutations are especially prevalent in low grade/stage tumors, with pTa tumors harboring mutations in 85% of the cases. These tumors recur in 70% of patients. Efficient FGFR3 mutation detection for prognostic purposes and for detection of recurrences in urine is an important clinical issue. In this paper, we describe a simple assay for the simultaneous detection of nine different FGFR3 mutations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The assay consists of one multiplex PCR, followed by extension of primers for each mutation with a labeled dideoxynucleotide. The extended primers are separated by capillary electrophoresis, and the identity of the incorporated nucleotide indicates the presence or absence of a mutation. RESULTS: The assay was found to be more sensitive than single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Mutations could still be detected with an input of only 1 ng of genomic DNA and in a 20-fold excess of wild-type DNA. Moreover, in urine samples from patients with a mutant tumor, the sensitivity of mutation detection was 62%. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a fast, easy to use assay for the simultaneous detection of FGFR3 mutations, which can be of assistance in clinical decision-making and as an alternative for the follow-up of patients by invasive cystoscopy for the detection of recurrences in urine.
Authors: Christian Hafner; Elena López-Knowles; Nuno M Luis; Agustí Toll; Eulàlia Baselga; Alex Fernández-Casado; Silvia Hernández; Adriana Ribé; Thomas Mentzel; Robert Stoehr; Ferdinand Hofstaedter; Michael Landthaler; Thomas Vogt; Ramòn M Pujol; Arndt Hartmann; Francisco X Real Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-08-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lambertus A Kiemeney; Patrick Sulem; Soren Besenbacher; Sita H Vermeulen; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Simon N Stacey; Julius Gudmundsson; Carlo Zanon; Jelena Kostic; Gisli Masson; Hjordis Bjarnason; Stefan T Palsson; Oskar B Skarphedinsson; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; J Alfred Witjes; Anne J Grotenhuis; Gerald W Verhaegh; D Timothy Bishop; Sei Chung Sak; Ananya Choudhury; Faye Elliott; Jennifer H Barrett; Carolyn D Hurst; Petra J de Verdier; Charlotta Ryk; Peter Rudnai; Eugene Gurzau; Kvetoslava Koppova; Paolo Vineis; Silvia Polidoro; Simonetta Guarrera; Carlotta Sacerdote; Marcello Campagna; Donatella Placidi; Cecilia Arici; Maurice P Zeegers; Eliane Kellen; Berta Saez Gutierrez; José I Sanz-Velez; Manuel Sanchez-Zalabardo; Gabriel Valdivia; Maria D Garcia-Prats; Jan G Hengstler; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Holger Dietrich; Roel A Ophoff; Leonard H van den Berg; Kristin Alexiusdottir; Kristleifur Kristjansson; Gudmundur Geirsson; Sigfus Nikulasson; Vigdis Petursdottir; Augustine Kong; Thorgeir Thorgeirsson; N Aydin Mungan; Annika Lindblom; Michael A van Es; Stefano Porru; Frank Buntinx; Klaus Golka; José I Mayordomo; Rajiv Kumar; Giuseppe Matullo; Gunnar Steineck; Anne E Kiltie; Katja K H Aben; Eirikur Jonsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Margaret A Knowles; Thorunn Rafnar; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-03-28 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Carolyn D Hurst; Olivia Alder; Fiona M Platt; Alastair Droop; Lucy F Stead; Julie E Burns; George J Burghel; Sunjay Jain; Leszek J Klimczak; Helen Lindsay; Jo-An Roulson; Claire F Taylor; Helene Thygesen; Angus J Cameron; Anne J Ridley; Helen R Mott; Dmitry A Gordenin; Margaret A Knowles Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: C G Stoehr; R Stoehr; A Hartmann; F Hofstaedter; K Junker; H Blaszyk; W F Wieland; W Otto; S Denzinger; B Walter Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Tahlita C M Zuiverloon; Cheno S Abas; Kirstin A van der Keur; Marcel Vermeij; Stephen S Tjin; Angela G van Tilborg; Martijn Busstra; Ellen C Zwarthoff Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2010-02-26 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Lucie C Kompier; Irene Lurkin; Madelon N M van der Aa; Bas W G van Rhijn; Theo H van der Kwast; Ellen C Zwarthoff Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kerstin Junker; Johanna M M van Oers; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Ines Kania; Joerg Schubert; Arndt Hartmann Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Irene Lurkin; Robert Stoehr; Carolyn D Hurst; Angela A G van Tilborg; Margaret A Knowles; Arndt Hartmann; Ellen C Zwarthoff Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-01-21 Impact factor: 3.240