PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of background factors on the rehabilitation pattern after a hip fracture in the elderly. METHOD: Prospective registration based on the Swedish national register for hip fracture patients called RIKSHOFT/SAHFE (Standardised Audit of Hip Fractures in Europe). The place of living was registered both before fracture and during the following four months period (120 days). Graphs were calculated and drawn based on day-to-day changes. Also influences of age, sex, fracture type and type of operation were analyzed. RESULTS: The patient's pre-fracture functional capacity as evidence by the place they were able to manage to live before the fracture was the most discriminating factor for the rehabilitation; more than sex, fracture type or type of operation. Age was also a highly discriminating factor with a pronounced influence on the rehabilitation pattern. CONCLUSIONS: These background parameters are very important factors when planning the rehabilitation of hip fracture patients. A strategy with individualized planning of the rehabilitation procedure will be highly necessary in the future, in view of the increasing amount of elderly with hip fractures prognosticated during the coming decades. The knowledge about influencing factors here presented will be useful when planning and performing the rehabilitation for this resource-consuming group of patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of background factors on the rehabilitation pattern after a hip fracture in the elderly. METHOD: Prospective registration based on the Swedish national register for hip fracturepatients called RIKSHOFT/SAHFE (Standardised Audit of Hip Fractures in Europe). The place of living was registered both before fracture and during the following four months period (120 days). Graphs were calculated and drawn based on day-to-day changes. Also influences of age, sex, fracture type and type of operation were analyzed. RESULTS: The patient's pre-fracture functional capacity as evidence by the place they were able to manage to live before the fracture was the most discriminating factor for the rehabilitation; more than sex, fracture type or type of operation. Age was also a highly discriminating factor with a pronounced influence on the rehabilitation pattern. CONCLUSIONS: These background parameters are very important factors when planning the rehabilitation of hip fracturepatients. A strategy with individualized planning of the rehabilitation procedure will be highly necessary in the future, in view of the increasing amount of elderly with hip fractures prognosticated during the coming decades. The knowledge about influencing factors here presented will be useful when planning and performing the rehabilitation for this resource-consuming group of patients.
Authors: Jennifer W Bea; Cynthia A Thomson; Robert B Wallace; Chunyuan Wu; Rebecca A Seguin; Scott B Going; Andrea LaCroix; Charles Eaton; Judith K Ockene; Michael J LaMonte; Rebecca Jackson; W Jerry Mysiw; Jean Wactawski-Wende Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lin Zhong; Elham Mahmoudi; Aviram M Giladi; Melissa Shauver; Kevin C Chung; Jennifer F Waljee Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Amit Rastogi; Gr Arun; Vakil Singh; Anant Singh; Ashutosh K Singh; Vinay Kumaraswamy Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 1.251