OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence as to whether the relationship between undernutrition and poor child development is causal. DESIGN: Selected studies from developing countries were discussed. Observational studies were first considered then experimental studies of preventative and remedial supplementation. The type of functions affected, the presence of sensitive periods and the role of protein and energy versus that of micronutrients were reviewed. RESULTS: Childhood undernutrition is generally associated with concurrent and longer term deficits in cognition, behaviour and motor skills, although the relationship is likely to be confounded by socio-economic factors. Supplementation trials have had many design problems. However, those beginning at any age from pregnancy up to 24 months have consistently had concurrent benefits suggesting a causal relationship. Supplement begun in older children had little or no effect, albeit there are too few studies to conclude with confidence. The limited evidence suggests that benefits are more likely to be sustained if supplementation begins in late pregnancy or at birth and is continued until the child is at least 24 months old. Deficits in cognition tend to be global and there is insufficient evidence of specific deficits. There is some evidence that the first 2 years of life are most sensitive to the effects of undernutrition. Most studies have failed to separate the effects of energy and protein from those of micronutrients. One study showed that energy and/or protein affects children's development. Psychosocial stimulation has had consistent benefits on undernourished children's development. CONCLUSIONS: Public health nutrition programmes should include a component in which children who are at risk are targeted during the first 2 years of life with combined interventions involving nutrition, health care and early stimulation.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence as to whether the relationship between undernutrition and poor child development is causal. DESIGN: Selected studies from developing countries were discussed. Observational studies were first considered then experimental studies of preventative and remedial supplementation. The type of functions affected, the presence of sensitive periods and the role of protein and energy versus that of micronutrients were reviewed. RESULTS: Childhood undernutrition is generally associated with concurrent and longer term deficits in cognition, behaviour and motor skills, although the relationship is likely to be confounded by socio-economic factors. Supplementation trials have had many design problems. However, those beginning at any age from pregnancy up to 24 months have consistently had concurrent benefits suggesting a causal relationship. Supplement begun in older children had little or no effect, albeit there are too few studies to conclude with confidence. The limited evidence suggests that benefits are more likely to be sustained if supplementation begins in late pregnancy or at birth and is continued until the child is at least 24 months old. Deficits in cognition tend to be global and there is insufficient evidence of specific deficits. There is some evidence that the first 2 years of life are most sensitive to the effects of undernutrition. Most studies have failed to separate the effects of energy and protein from those of micronutrients. One study showed that energy and/or protein affects children's development. Psychosocial stimulation has had consistent benefits on undernourished children's development. CONCLUSIONS: Public health nutrition programmes should include a component in which children who are at risk are targeted during the first 2 years of life with combined interventions involving nutrition, health care and early stimulation.
Authors: Iwa Antonow-Schlorke; Matthias Schwab; Laura A Cox; Cun Li; Kristina Stuchlik; Otto W Witte; Peter W Nathanielsz; Thomas J McDonald Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Katja Franke; Bea R H Van den Bergh; Susanne R de Rooij; Nasim Kroegel; Peter W Nathanielsz; Florian Rakers; Tessa J Roseboom; Otto W Witte; Matthias Schwab Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Elizabeth L Prado; Amina A Abubakar; Souheila Abbeddou; Elizabeth Y Jimenez; Jérôme W Somé; Jean-Bosco Ouédraogo Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 2.299
Authors: Catharine R Gale; Christopher N Martyn; Lynne D Marriott; Jennifer Limond; Sarah Crozier; Hazel M Inskip; Keith M Godfrey; Catherine M Law; Cyrus Cooper; Siân M Robinson Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2009-01-05 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Elizabeth A Cromwell; Queen Dube; Stephen R Cole; Chawanangwa Chirambo; Anna E Dow; Robert S Heyderman; Annelies Van Rie Journal: Eur J Paediatr Neurol Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 3.140