Literature DB >> 16275728

Spatial variability of soil phosphorus in relation to the topographic index and critical source areas: sampling for assessing risk to water quality.

Trevor Page1, Philip M Haygarth, Keith J Beven, Adrian Joynes, Trisha Butler, Chris Keeler, Jim Freer, Philip N Owens, Gavin A Wood.   

Abstract

A measure of soil P status in agricultural soils is generally required for assisting with prediction of potential P loss from agricultural catchments and assessing risk for water quality. The objectives of this paper are twofold: (i) investigating the soil P status, distribution, and variability, both spatially and with soil depth, of two different first-order catchments; and (ii) determining variation in soil P concentration in relation to catchment topography (quantified as the "topographic index") and critical source areas (CSAs). The soil P measurements showed large spatial variability, not only between fields and land uses, but also within individual fields and in part was thought to be strongly influenced by areas where cattle tended to congregate and areas where manure was most commonly spread. Topographic index alone was not related to the distribution of soil P, and does not seem to provide an adequate indicator for CSAs in the study catchments. However, CSAs may be used in conjunction with soil P data for help in determining a more "effective" catchment soil P status. The difficulties in defining CSAs a priori, particularly for modeling and prediction purposes, however, suggest that other more "integrated" measures of catchment soil P status, such as baseflow P concentrations or streambed sediment P concentrations, might be more useful. Since observed soil P distribution is variable and is also difficult to relate to nationally available soil P data, any assessment of soil P status for determining risk of P loss is uncertain and problematic, given other catchment physicochemical characteristics and the sampling strategy employed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16275728     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2004.0398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  5 in total

1.  Spatial variation of surface soil available phosphorous and its relation with environmental factors in the Chaohu Lake watershed.

Authors:  Yongnian Gao; Junfeng Gao; Jiongfeng Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Conversion of dissolved phosphorus in runoff by ferric sulfate to a form less available to algae: Field performance and cost assessment.

Authors:  Risto Uusitalo; Aaro Närvänen; Antti Kaseva; Aino Launto-Tiuttu; Janne Heikkinen; Päivi Joki-Heiskala; Kimmo Rasa; Tapio Salo
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Phosphate stable oxygen isotope variability within a temperate agricultural soil.

Authors:  Steven J Granger; Paul Harris; Sabine Peukert; Rongrong Guo; Federica Tamburini; Martin S A Blackwell; Nicholas J K Howden; Steve McGrath
Journal:  Geoderma       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.114

4.  Spatial variation in soil properties and diffuse losses between and within grassland fields with similar short-term management.

Authors:  S Peukert; B A Griffith; P J Murray; C J A Macleod; R E Brazier
Journal:  Eur J Soil Sci       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.949

5.  Grazing and topography control nutrient pools in low Arctic soils of Southwest Greenland.

Authors:  Maud A J van Soest; N John Anderson; Roland Bol; Liz R Dixon; Philip M Haygarth
Journal:  Eur J Soil Sci       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 4.178

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.