Literature DB >> 16275234

Fluorescence in situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3.

Man Li1, Catherine Marin DeUgarte, Mark Surrey, Hal Danzer, Alan DeCherney, David L Hill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the concordance of day-6 blastocyst analysis with the day-3 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) aneuploidy diagnosis.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: In vitro fertilization laboratory. PATIENT(S): Six hundred sixty embryos were included from 94 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Single blastomeres biopsied on day 3. Aneuploidy screening for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y were analyzed. Left-over blastocysts were reanalyzed on day 6. RESULT(S): Among the 660 embryos evaluated, 367 (55.6%) were euploid and 281 (42.6%) were aneuploid. Of the euploid embryos, 213 embryos were transferred, 68 were frozen on day 5, and 86 were left. All 281 aneuploid embryos were further cultured, and 55 (19.6%) progressed to blastocysts. When FISH reanalysis was performed, 33 of 55 blastocysts (60%) were confirmed aneuploid in concordance with the day-3 diagnosis. However, 22 of 55 blastocysts (40%) were determined to be euploid. In addition, 207 aneuploid embryos (73.7%) arrested before day 6, as opposed to 32 of the 86 euploid embryos (37.2%). CONCLUSION(S): Day-3 single-cell embryo biopsy reveals that aneuploidy can be confirmed in 60.7% of the blastocysts on reanalysis. The majority of discordance is most likely due to embryo mosaicism and possibly a limited ability to "self-correct."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16275234     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  28 in total

1.  SNP array-based copy number and genotype analyses for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of human unbalanced translocations.

Authors:  Chris M J van Uum; Servi J C Stevens; Joseph C F M Dreesen; Marion Drüsedau; Hubert J Smeets; Bertien Hollanders-Crombach; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Joep P M Geraedts; John J M Engelen; Edith Coonen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective.

Authors:  C B Coulam; R S Jeyendran; M Fiddler; E Pergament
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Chaos in the embryo.

Authors:  David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cédric Le Caignec; Michèle Ampe; Peter Konings; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Mustapha Amyere; Miikka Vikkula; Frans Schuit; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Geert Verbeke; Thomas D'Hooghe; Yves Moreau; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 6.  IVF/ICSI with or without preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy in couples without genetic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel A Checa; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ivan Solà; Ana Robles; Ramón Carreras; Juan Balasch
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Human embryo mosaicism: did we drop the ball on chromosomal testing?

Authors:  Navid Esfandiari; Megan E Bunnell; Robert F Casper
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts.

Authors:  L E Northrop; N R Treff; B Levy; R T Scott
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening is significantly more consistent than FISH.

Authors:  Nathan R Treff; Brynn Levy; Jing Su; Lesley E Northrop; Xin Tao; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.