Literature DB >> 16275021

Perceiving identical sounds as speech or non-speech modulates activity in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus.

Riikka Möttönen1, Gemma A Calvert, Iiro P Jääskeläinen, Paul M Matthews, Thomas Thesen, Jyrki Tuomainen, Mikko Sams.   

Abstract

The left superior temporal cortex shows greater responsiveness to speech than to non-speech sounds according to previous neuroimaging studies, suggesting that this brain region has a special role in speech processing. However, since speech sounds differ acoustically from the non-speech sounds, it is possible that this region is not involved in speech perception per se, but rather in processing of some complex acoustic features. "Sine wave speech" (SWS) provides a tool to study neural speech specificity using identical acoustic stimuli, which can be perceived either as speech or non-speech, depending on previous experience of the stimuli. We scanned 21 subjects using 3T functional MRI in two sessions, both including SWS and control stimuli. In the pre-training session, all subjects perceived the SWS stimuli as non-speech. In the post-training session, the identical stimuli were perceived as speech by 16 subjects. In these subjects, SWS stimuli elicited significantly stronger activity within the left posterior superior temporal sulcus (STSp) in the post- vs. pre-training session. In contrast, activity in this region was not enhanced after training in 5 subjects who did not perceive SWS stimuli as speech. Moreover, the control stimuli, which were always perceived as non-speech, elicited similar activity in this region in both sessions. Altogether, the present findings suggest that activation of the neural speech representations in the left STSp might be a pre-requisite for hearing sounds as speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16275021     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

1.  Speech versus song: multiple pitch-sensitive areas revealed by a naturally occurring musical illusion.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Fred Dick; Diana Deutsch; Marty Sereno
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Estimating speech spectra for copy synthesis by linear prediction and by hand.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Kathryn R Dubowski; Morgana L Davids; Emily F Thomas; Nina U Paddu; Yael S Grossman; Marina Moskalenko
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Left lateralized enhancement of orofacial somatosensory processing due to speech sounds.

Authors:  Takayuki Ito; Alexis R Johns; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Attentional and linguistic interactions in speech perception.

Authors:  Merav Sabri; Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik Desai; David A Medler; Michael D Leitl; Einat Liebenthal
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies.

Authors:  Robert J Zatorre; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Neural correlates of sine-wave speech intelligibility in human frontal and temporal cortex.

Authors:  Sattar Khoshkhoo; Matthew K Leonard; Nima Mesgarani; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Left posterior temporal regions are sensitive to auditory categorization.

Authors:  Rutvik Desai; Einat Liebenthal; Eric Waldron; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Tuning the developing brain to social signals of emotions.

Authors:  Jukka M Leppänen; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Efficient visual search from synchronized auditory signals requires transient audiovisual events.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; John Cass; Christian N L Olivers; Jan Theeuwes; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perceiving pitch absolutely: comparing absolute and relative pitch possessors in a pitch memory task.

Authors:  Katrin Schulze; Nadine Gaab; Gottfried Schlaug
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.