Literature DB >> 16274493

Vaccination and early protection against non-host-specific Salmonella serotypes in poultry: exploitation of innate immunity and microbial activity.

F Van Immerseel1, U Methner, I Rychlik, B Nagy, P Velge, G Martin, N Foster, R Ducatelle, P A Barrow.   

Abstract

A recent European Union Directive required member states to put monitoring and control programmes in place, of which vaccination is a central component. Live Salmonella vaccines generally confer better protection than killed vaccines, because the former stimulate both cell-mediated and humoral immunity. Administering Salmonella bacteria orally to newly hatched chickens results in extensive gut colonization and a strong adaptive immune stimulus but broiler chickens are immunologically immature. However, colonization exerts a variety of rapid (within 24 h) protective effects. These include specific colonization-inhibition (competitive exclusion) in which the protective bacteria exert a profound resistance to establishment and colonization by other related bacteria. This is thought to be primarily a metabolic attribute of the vaccinating bacteria but may also involve competition for attachment sites. The presence of large numbers of bacteria originating from a live Salmonella vaccine in the intestine can also induce infiltration of polymorphonuclear cells into the intestinal wall, which confers resistance to invasion and systemic spread by virulent Salmonella strains. This opens new perspectives for vaccine usage in broilers, layers and breeding poultry but also in other animals which show increased susceptibility to infection because of their young age or for other reasons, such as oral chemoprophylaxis or chemotherapy, where the lack of established normal gut flora is an issue. We recommend that all live vaccines considered for oral administration should be tested for their ability to induce the two protective effects described above. Further developments in live Salmonella vaccines are, however, currently hindered by fears associated with the use and release of live vaccines which may be genetically modified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16274493      PMCID: PMC2870330          DOI: 10.1017/S0950268805004711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  32 in total

1.  Immune response following vaccination against Salmonella Enteritidis using 2 commercial bacterins in laying hens.

Authors:  Thi Q L Tran; Sylvain Quessy; Ann Letellier; Annie Desrosiers; Martine Boulianne
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 2.  Innate immunity in vertebrates: an overview.

Authors:  Mario Riera Romo; Dayana Pérez-Martínez; Camila Castillo Ferrer
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 3.  Current status of veterinary vaccines.

Authors:  Els N T Meeusen; John Walker; Andrew Peters; Paul-Pierre Pastoret; Gregers Jungersen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Evaluation of the Salmonella enterica Serovar Pullorum Pathogenicity Island 2 Mutant as a Candidate Live Attenuated Oral Vaccine.

Authors:  Junlei Yin; Zhao Cheng; Xiaochun Wang; Lijuan Xu; Qiuchun Li; Shizhong Geng; Xinan Jiao
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-04-29

5.  Expression of Toll-like receptor 4 and downstream effectors in selected cecal cell subpopulations of chicks resistant or susceptible to Salmonella carrier state.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Chaussé; Olivier Grépinet; Elisabeth Bottreau; Yves Le Vern; Pierrette Menanteau; Jérome Trotereau; Vincent Robert; Zhiguang Wu; Dominique Kerboeuf; Catherine Beaumont; Philippe Velge
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Effect of Salmonella vaccination of breeder chickens on contamination of broiler chicken carcasses in integrated poultry operations.

Authors:  Fernanda C Dórea; Dana J Cole; Charles Hofacre; Katherine Zamperini; Demetrius Mathis; Michael P Doyle; Margie D Lee; John J Maurer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Host transmission of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is controlled by virulence factors and indigenous intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Trevor D Lawley; Donna M Bouley; Yana E Hoy; Christine Gerke; David A Relman; Denise M Monack
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Drastic decrease of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from humans in Belgium in 2005, shift in phage types and influence on foodborne outbreaks.

Authors:  J M Collard; S Bertrand; K Dierick; C Godard; C Wildemauwe; K Vermeersch; J Duculot; F Van Immerseel; F Pasmans; H Imberechts; C Quinet
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.451

9.  Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis tatB and tatC mutants are impaired in Caco-2 cell invasion in vitro and show reduced systemic spread in chickens.

Authors:  Claudia Silva Mickael; Po-King S Lam; Emil M Berberov; Brenda Allan; Andrew A Potter; Wolfgang Köster
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  The contribution of genes required for anaerobic respiration to the virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum for chickens.

Authors:  J B Paiva; R A C Penha Filho; E A Pereira; M V F Lemos; P A Barrow; M A Lovell; A Berchieri
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.