Literature DB >> 16274346

Barriers to student access to patients in a group of teaching hospitals.

Leslie G Olson1, Suzanne R Hill, David A Newby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the number of patients in our teaching hospitals who were, on any given day, both available and willing to see medical students. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Repeated cross-sectional audit in four teaching hospitals in the greater Newcastle area of New South Wales (one tertiary referral hospital, two district general hospitals, and one hospital combining general medicine and surgery with specialised oncology services). Audits were conducted three times, 2 months apart. PARTICIPANTS: All adult inpatients in the four hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of patients present and accessible to students, present but inaccessible, absent, or unfit to be seen for clinical reasons; numbers of patients who agreed to history-taking and physical examination by a medical student.
RESULTS: Of 1960 patients, 959 (49%) were present and accessible to students. Only 11% were absent, and the most common reason students could not see patients was that the patients were said by nursing staff to be unfit to see medical students (25%). Of those present and accessible, 70% said they would agree to provide a history, and 67% that they would agree to physical examination.
CONCLUSIONS: Across all four teaching hospitals about 200-250 patients are available and willing to see medical students on any given day. This is too few to provide our current student population of 500 with extensive clinical experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16274346     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb07123.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  3 in total

1.  Advances in cancer management: at what cost to medical student education?

Authors:  Darren L Starmer; Michael B Barton
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Designing and implementing a skills program using a clinically integrated, multi-professional approach: using evaluation to drive curriculum change.

Authors:  Sandra E Carr; Antonio Celenza; Fiona Lake
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2009-09-20

3.  Improved self- and external assessment of the clinical abilities of medical students through structured improvement measures in an internal medicine bedside course.

Authors:  S M Fünger; H Lesevic; S Rosner; I Ott; P Berberat; C Nikendei; C Sonne
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.