Literature DB >> 16273623

Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II scoring system in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome.

Ting-Kai Leung1, Chi-Ming Lee, Shyr-Yi Lin, Hsin-Chi Chen, Hung-Jung Wang, Li-Kuo Shen, Ya-Yen Chen.   

Abstract

AIM: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a process with variable involvement of regional tissues or organ systems. Multifactorial scales included the Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) systems and Balthazar computed tomography severity index (CTSI). The purpose of this review study was to assess the accuracy of CTSI, Ranson score, and APACHE II score in course and outcome prediction of AP.
METHODS: We reviewed 121 patients who underwent helical CT within 48 h after onset of symptoms of a first episode of AP between 1999 and 2003. Fourteen inappropriate subjects were excluded; we reviewed the 107 contrast-enhanced CT images to calculate the CTSI. We also reviewed their Ranson and APACHE II score. In addition, complications, duration of hospitalization, mortality rate, and other pathology history also were our comparison parameters.
RESULTS: We classified 85 patients (79%) as having mild AP (CTSI <5) and 22 patients (21%) as having severe AP (CTSI > or =5). In mild group, the mean APACHE II score and Ranson score was 8.6+/-1.9 and 2.4+/-1.2, and those of severe group was 10.2+/-2.1 and 3.1+/-0.8, respectively. The most common complication was pseudocyst and abscess and it presented in 21 (20%) patients and their CTSI was 5.9+/-1.4. A CTSI > or =5 significantly correlated with death, complication present, and prolonged length of stay. Patients with a CTSI > or =5 were 15 times to die than those CTSI <5, and the prolonged length of stay and complications present were 17 times and 8 times than that in CTSI <5, respectively.
CONCLUSION: CTSI is a useful tool in assessing the severity and outcome of AP and the CTSI > or =5 is an index in our study. Although Ranson score and APACHE II score also are choices to be the predictors for complications, mortality and the length of stay of AP, the sensitivity of them are lower than CTSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16273623      PMCID: PMC4436733          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i38.6049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  13 in total

1.  Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE II and III scoring systems in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome.

Authors:  Constantinos Chatzicostas; Maria Roussomoustakaki; Emmanouel Vardas; John Romanos; Elias A Kouroumalis
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Computed tomography severity index is a predictor of outcomes for severe pancreatitis.

Authors:  E J Simchuk; L W Traverso; Y Nukui; R A Kozarek
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Management of severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  M Yousaf; K McCallion; T Diamond
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  A single-centre double-blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  C W Imrie; I S Benjamin; J C Ferguson; A J McKay; I Mackenzie; J O'Neill; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Serial computed tomography is rarely necessary in patients with acute pancreatitis: a prospective study in 102 patients.

Authors:  N Munoz-Bongrand; Y Panis; P Soyer; F Riché; M J Laisné; M Boudiaf; P Valleur
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems.

Authors:  C Wilson; D I Heath; C W Imrie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Prognostic value of CT in the early assessment of patients with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J Darío Casas; Rocío Díaz; Gracia Valderas; Antonio Mariscal; Patricia Cuadras
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; D L Robinson; A J Megibow; J H Ranson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Early prediction of acute pancreatitis: prospective study comparing computed tomography scans, Ranson, Glascow, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, and various serum markers.

Authors:  John H Robert; Jean Louis Frossard; Bernadette Mermillod; Claudio Soravia; Nouri Mensi; Marc Roth; Adrien Rohner; Antoine Hadengue; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Abdominal computed tomography prolongs length of stay and is frequently unnecessary in the evaluation of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Frederick Fleszler; Frank Friedenberg; Benjamin Krevsky; David Friedel; Leonard E Braitman
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.378

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Criteria for the diagnosis and severity stratification of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Makoto Otsuki; Kazunori Takeda; Seiki Matsuno; Yasuyuki Kihara; Masaru Koizumi; Masahiko Hirota; Tetsuhide Ito; Keisho Kataoka; Motoji Kitagawa; Kazuo Inui; Yoshifumi Takeyama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The ability of emergency physicians to diagnose and score acute pancreatitis on computed tomography.

Authors:  A Karagöz; E E Ünlüer; O Oyar; F E Topal; F Topal
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Mortality indicators and risk factors for intra-abdominal hypertension in severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J G Zhao; Q Liao; Y P Zhao; Y Hu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 May-Jun

4.  Comparison of scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Joon Hyun Cho; Tae Nyeun Kim; Hyun Hee Chung; Kook Hyun Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Accuracy of early CT findings for predicting disease course in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Onur Taydas; Emre Unal; Ali Devrim Karaosmanoglu; Mehmet Ruhi Onur; Erhan Akpinar
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Severity and outcomes of acute alcoholic pancreatitis in cannabis users.

Authors:  Hemant Goyal; Kelsey Guerreso; Betsy Smith; Kaitlin Harper; Sheetal Patel; Akash Patel; Puja Parikh
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-21

7.  Surgery in Pancreatic Necrosis-Challenges and Outcomes in an Industrial Hospital.

Authors:  Ashok Chattoraj; Sunil Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 8.  Severe acute pancreatitis: pathogenetic aspects and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Ibrahim-A Al Mofleh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Severe acute pancreatitis in the elderly: etiology and clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Ming-Jun Xin; Hong Chen; Bin Luo; Jia-Bang Sun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Acute biliary pancreatitis: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Zakaria M Hazem
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.