Literature DB >> 16273590

Impact of a lead glass screen on scatter radiation to eyes and hands in interventional cardiologists.

Micha Maeder1, Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca, Thomas Wolber, Peter Ammann, Hans Roelli, Franziska Rohner, Hans Rickli.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a transparent lead glass screen (TLGS) on scatter radiation to the eyes and the hands in interventional cardiologists and to compare the results to the recommended annual threshold values of 150 and 500 mSv, respectively. Local radiation doses to the left eye and the ring finger of the left hand of three operators (A, B, C) were assessed by thermoluminiscence dosimeters during 813 coronary angiographies (CAs), including 190 ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) either with a TLGS placed between patient and operator [615 CAs including 138 ad hoc PCIs; dose-area product (DAP) = 84.9 +/- 71.3 Gy x cm(2)], or without (198 CAs including 52 PCIs; DAP = 85.7 +/- 61.5 Gy x cm(2)). To determine the efficacy of the TLGS, average DAP-normalized local doses were calculated. Using a TLGS, operator A, B, and C performed 259 (in 9 months), 211 (in 8 months), and 145 CAs (in 8 months) with TLGS and acquired cumulative eye lens doses of 5.5, 1.5, and 1.0 mSv corresponding to extrapolated annual doses of 7.3, 2.3, and 1.5 mSv. The cumulative finger doses were 9.6, 10.3, and 6.4 mSv, resulting in extrapolated annual doses of 12.8, 15.5, and 9.6 mSv. Compared to 139 (in 5 months), 36 (in 2 months), and 23 CAs (in 2 months) without TLGS, the use of a TLGS reduced the DAP-normalized eye dose by a factor of 19 (with TLGS 0.153 vs. without TLGS 2.924 microSv/Gy x cm(2)), whereas only a weak effect on the dose to the hands was observed (with TLGS 0.504 vs. without TLGS 0.578 microSv/Gy x cm(2)). The consequent use of a TLGS efficiently reduces scatter radiation to the operator's eyes in daily practice, but has only minimal effects on the dose to the hands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16273590     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  9 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of Contrast and Radiation Injury During Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Arash Ehteshami Afshar; Puja B Parikh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-22

2.  Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Eliseo Vañó; Gabriel Bartal; Stephen Balter; Robert Dixon; Renato Padovani; Beth Schueler; John F Cardella; Thierry de Baère
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24

Review 4.  The Growing Culture Of A Minimally Fluoroscopic Approach In Electrophysiology Lab.

Authors:  Michela Casella; Eleonora Russo; Francesca Pizzamiglio; Sergio Conti; Ghaliah Al-Mohani; Daniele Colombo; Victor Casula; Yuri D Alessandra; Viviana Biagioli; Corrado Carbucicchio; Stefania Riva; Gaetano Fassini; Massimo Moltrasio; Fabrizio Tundo; Martina Zucchetti; Benedetta Majocchi; Vittoria Marino; Giovanni Forleo; Pasquale Santangeli; Luigi Di Biase; Antonio Dello Russo; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-08-31

5.  Radiation-induced noncancer risks in interventional cardiology: optimisation of procedures and staff and patient dose reduction.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Aini AbAziz; Ahmad Khairuddin Md Yusof
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Reduction of Radiation Risk to Interventional Cardiologists and Patients during Angiography and Coronary Angioplasty.

Authors:  Mohsen Mohammadi; Leili Danaee; Effat Alizadeh
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2017-07

7.  Reduction of operator radiation exposure using a passive robotic device during fluoroscopy-guided arterial puncture: an experimental study in a swine model.

Authors:  Muhammad Umair Ahmad Khan; Chang-Hwan Yoon; Byung-Ju Yi
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-05-29

Review 8.  Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Tushar Garg; Apurva Shrigiriwar
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-10

9.  Physical analysis of the shielding capacity for a lightweight apron designed for shielding low intensity scattering X-rays.

Authors:  Seon Chil Kim; Jeong Ryeol Choi; Byeong Kyou Jeon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.