Literature DB >> 16273523

Inhibition of zebrafish fin regeneration using in vivo electroporation of morpholinos against fgfr1 and msxb.

Ryan Thummel1, Shan Bai, Michael P Sarras, Peizhen Song, Jeffrey McDermott, Jeffrey Brewer, Martin Perry, Xiaoming Zhang, David R Hyde, Alan R Godwin.   

Abstract

Increased interest in using zebrafish as a model organism has led to a resurgence of fin regeneration studies. This has allowed for the identification of a large number of gene families, including signaling molecules and transcription factors, which are expressed during regeneration. However, in cases where no specific inhibitor is available for the gene product of interest, determination of a functional role for these genes has been difficult. Here we demonstrate that in vivo electroporation of morpholino oligonucleotides is a feasible approach for protein knock-down during fin regeneration. Morpholino oligonucleotides against fgfr1 and msxb were utilized and knock-down of both proteins resulted in reduced fin outgrowth. Importantly, Fgfr1 knock-down phenocopied outgrowth inhibition obtained with an Fgfr1 inhibitor. Furthermore, this method provided direct evidence for a functional role for msxb in caudal fin regeneration. Finally, knock-down of Fgfr1, but not Msxb, affected the blastemal expression of msxc, suggesting this technique can be used to determine epistasis in genetic pathways affecting regeneration. Thus, this convenient reverse genetic approach allows researchers to quickly (1) assess the function of genes known to be expressed during fin regeneration, (2) screen genes for functional relevance during fin regeneration, and (3) assign genes to the molecular pathways underlying fin regeneration. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16273523     DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.20630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  64 in total

1.  Targeting the zebrafish optic tectum using in vivo electroporation.

Authors:  Kenric J Hoegler; John H Horne
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2010-07-01

2.  Fgf-dependent depletion of microRNA-133 promotes appendage regeneration in zebrafish.

Authors:  Viravuth P Yin; J Michael Thomson; Ryan Thummel; David R Hyde; Scott M Hammond; Kenneth D Poss
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Extracellular component hyaluronic acid and its receptor Hmmr are required for epicardial EMT during heart regeneration.

Authors:  Maria A Missinato; Kimimasa Tobita; Nicla Romano; James A Carroll; Michael Tsang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 4.  Molecular signaling networks that choreograph epimorphic fin regeneration in zebrafish - a mini-review.

Authors:  Tamara L Tal; Jill A Franzosa; Robert L Tanguay
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 5.140

5.  A histone demethylase is necessary for regeneration in zebrafish.

Authors:  Scott Stewart; Zhi-Yang Tsun; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Impaired tissue regeneration corresponds with altered expression of developmental genes that persists in the metabolic memory state of diabetic zebrafish.

Authors:  Michael P Sarras; Alexey A Leontovich; Ansgar S Olsen; Robert V Intine
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Characterization of multiple light damage paradigms reveals regional differences in photoreceptor loss.

Authors:  Jennifer L Thomas; Craig M Nelson; Xixia Luo; David R Hyde; Ryan Thummel
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Botulinum toxin induces muscle paralysis and inhibits bone regeneration in zebrafish.

Authors:  Anthony M Recidoro; Amanda C Roof; Michael Schmitt; Leah E Worton; Timothy Petrie; Nicholas Strand; Brandon J Ausk; Sundar Srinivasan; Randall T Moon; Edith M Gardiner; Werner Kaminsky; Steven D Bain; Christopher H Allan; Ted S Gross; Ronald Y Kwon
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Regeneration and reprogramming compared.

Authors:  Bea Christen; Vanesa Robles; Marina Raya; Ida Paramonov; Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  FGF signalling during embryo development regulates cilia length in diverse epithelia.

Authors:  Judith M Neugebauer; Jeffrey D Amack; Annita G Peterson; Brent W Bisgrove; H Joseph Yost
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.