Literature DB >> 16273399

Attentional demands associated with the use of a light fingertip touch for postural control during quiet standing.

Nicolas Vuillerme1, Brice Isableu, Vincent Nougier.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present experiment was to investigate whether and how using a light fingertip touch for postural control during quiet standing requires additional attentional demands. Nine young healthy university students were asked to respond as rapidly as possible to an unpredictable auditory stimulus while maintaining stable seated and upright postures in three sensory conditions: vision, no-vision and no-vision/touch. Touch condition involved a gentle light touch with the right index finger on a nearby surface at waist height. Center of foot pressure (CoP) displacements were recorded using a force platform. Reaction times (RTs) values were used as an index of the attentional demand necessary for calibrating the postural system. Results showed decreased CoP displacements in both the vision and no-vision/touch conditions relative to the no-vision condition. More interestingly, a longer RT in the no-vision/touch than in the vision and no-vision conditions was observed. The present findings suggest that the ability to use a light fingertip touch as a source of sensory information to improve postural control during quiet standing is attention demanding.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16273399     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0142-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context.

Authors:  A Shumway-Cook; M Woollacott
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus.

Authors:  G Wulf; N McNevin; C H Shea
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-11

3.  Fingertip touch improves postural stability in patients with peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  R Dickstein; C L Shupert; F B Horak
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 4.  Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research.

Authors:  Marjorie Woollacott; Anne Shumway-Cook
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  The dual-task methodology and assessing the attentional demands of ambulation with walking devices.

Authors:  D L Wright; T L Kemp
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1992-04

Review 6.  Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences.

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Common effects of touch and vision on postural parameters.

Authors:  M A Riley; S Wong; S Mitra; M T Turvey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Light touch contact as a balance aid.

Authors:  J J Jeka
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-05

9.  Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium.

Authors:  Y Lajoie; N Teasdale; C Bard; M Fleury
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The role of haptic cues from rough and slippery surfaces in human postural control.

Authors:  J J Jeka; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effects of biofeedback on secondary-task response time and postural stability in older adults.

Authors:  Stephanie Haggerty; Liang-Ting Jiang; Andrzej Galecki; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Processing time of addition or withdrawal of single or combined balance-stabilizing haptic and visual information.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  EEG frequency analysis of cortical brain activities induced by effect of light touch.

Authors:  Tomoya Ishigaki; Kozo Ueta; Ryota Imai; Shu Morioka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The impact of light fingertip touch on haptic cortical processing during a standing balance task.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; William E McIlroy; W Richard Staines; W Richard Staines
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of light touch on the amplitude of cutaneous reflexes in the arms during treadmill walking.

Authors:  Juan Forero; John E Misiaszek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Light touch for balance: influence of a time-varying external driving signal.

Authors:  Alan M Wing; Leif Johannsen; Satoshi Endo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Haptic touch reduces sway by increasing axial tone.

Authors:  E Franzén; V S Gurfinkel; W G Wright; P J Cordo; F B Horak
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Effect of cognitive task complexity on dual task postural stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abubakar Tijjani Salihu; Keith D Hill; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Reduced postural sway during quiet standing by light touch is due to finger tactile feedback but not mechanical support.

Authors:  Motoki Kouzaki; Kei Masani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Obesity impact on the attentional cost for controlling posture.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Mignardot; Isabelle Olivier; Emmanuel Promayon; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.