AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether dynamic strength training modifies the control of lipolysis, with particular attention paid to the involvement of the antilipolytic adrenergic alpha 2A receptor (ADRA2A) pathway. METHODS: Twelve obese men (age: 47.4+/-2.8 years; BMI: 32.7+/-0.9) were investigated during a 210-min euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp conducted before and after 3 months of dynamic strength training. Before and during the third hour of the clamp, the lipolytic effect of a perfusion of isoproterenol or adrenaline (epinephrine) alone or associated with the ADRA2A antagonist phentolamine was evaluated using the microdialysis method of measuring extracellular glycerol concentration (EGC) in subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SCAAT). In addition, biopsies of SCAAT were carried out before and after training to determine mRNA levels RESULTS: The training increased insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue. The decrease of EGC was more pronounced during the clamp conducted after the training period than during the clamp done in pre-training conditions. Before and after the training, catecholamines induced an increase in EGC, the increase being lower during the clamp on each occasion. The isoproterenol-induced increase in EGC was higher after the training. Adrenaline-induced lipolysis was potentiated by phentolamine after but not before the training. There were no training-induced changes in mRNA levels of key genes of the lipolytic pathway in SCAAT. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In obese subjects, dynamic strength training improves whole-body and adipose tissue insulin responsiveness. It increases responsiveness to the adrenergic beta receptor stimulation of lipolysis and to the antilipolytic action of catecholamines mediated by ADRA2As.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to investigate whether dynamic strength training modifies the control of lipolysis, with particular attention paid to the involvement of the antilipolytic adrenergic alpha 2A receptor (ADRA2A) pathway. METHODS: Twelve obesemen (age: 47.4+/-2.8 years; BMI: 32.7+/-0.9) were investigated during a 210-min euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp conducted before and after 3 months of dynamic strength training. Before and during the third hour of the clamp, the lipolytic effect of a perfusion of isoproterenol or adrenaline (epinephrine) alone or associated with the ADRA2A antagonist phentolamine was evaluated using the microdialysis method of measuring extracellular glycerol concentration (EGC) in subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SCAAT). In addition, biopsies of SCAAT were carried out before and after training to determine mRNA levels RESULTS: The training increased insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue. The decrease of EGC was more pronounced during the clamp conducted after the training period than during the clamp done in pre-training conditions. Before and after the training, catecholamines induced an increase in EGC, the increase being lower during the clamp on each occasion. The isoproterenol-induced increase in EGC was higher after the training. Adrenaline-induced lipolysis was potentiated by phentolamine after but not before the training. There were no training-induced changes in mRNA levels of key genes of the lipolytic pathway in SCAAT. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: In obese subjects, dynamic strength training improves whole-body and adipose tissue insulin responsiveness. It increases responsiveness to the adrenergic beta receptor stimulation of lipolysis and to the antilipolytic action of catecholamines mediated by ADRA2As.
Authors: V Stich; I De Glisezinski; F Crampes; J Hejnova; J M Cottet-Emard; J Galitzky; M Lafontan; D Rivière; M Berlan Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: A Katz; S S Nambi; K Mather; A D Baron; D A Follmann; G Sullivan; M J Quon Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Cédric Moro; Jan Polak; Blanka Richterova; Coralie Sengenès; Terezie Pelikanova; Jean Galitzky; Vladimir Stich; Max Lafontan; Michel Berlan Journal: Metabolism Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Jarna C Hannukainen; Pirjo Nuutila; Ronald Borra; Borra Ronald; Jaakko Kaprio; Urho M Kujala; Tuula Janatuinen; Olli J Heinonen; Jukka Kapanen; Tapio Viljanen; Merja Haaparanta; Tapani Rönnemaa; Riitta Parkkola; Juhani Knuuti; Kari K Kalliokoski Journal: J Physiol Date: 2006-10-19 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Hassane Zouhal; Sophie Lemoine-Morel; Marie-Eve Mathieu; Gretchen A Casazza; Georges Jabbour Journal: Sports Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Carlos Castaño; Mercedes Mirasierra; Mario Vallejo; Anna Novials; Marcelina Párrizas Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kristin L Campbell; Karen W Makar; Mario Kratz; Karen E Foster-Schubert; Anne McTiernan; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2009-01