Literature DB >> 16273322

Genetic and environmental contributions to loneliness in adults: the Netherlands twin register study.

Dorret I Boomsma1, Gonneke Willemsen, Conor V Dolan, Louise C Hawkley, John T Cacioppo.   

Abstract

Heritability estimates based on two small studies in children indicate that the genetic contribution to individual differences in loneliness is approximately 50%. Heritability estimates of complex traits such as loneliness may change across the lifespan, however, as the frequency, duration, and range of exposure to environmental influences accrues, or as the expression of genetic factors changes. We examined data on loneliness from 8,387 young adult and adult Dutch twins who had participated in longitudinal survey studies. A measure of loneliness was developed based on factor analyses of items of the YASR (The Young Adult Self Report). Variation in loneliness was analyzed with genetic structural equation models. The estimate of genetic contributions to variation in loneliness in adults was 48%, which is similar to the heritability estimates found previously in children. There was no evidence for sex or age differences in genetic architecture. Sex differences in prevalence were significant, but we did not see an association with age or birth cohort. All resemblance between twin relatives was explained by shared genes, without any suggestion of a contribution of shared environmental factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16273322     DOI: 10.1007/s10519-005-6040-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  47 in total

1.  Childhood physical maltreatment, perceived social isolation, and internalizing symptoms: a longitudinal, three-wave, population-based study.

Authors:  Mashhood Ahmed Sheikh
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  Emerging perspectives in social neuroscience and neuroeconomics of aging.

Authors:  Lisbeth Nielsen; Mara Mather
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Social isolation.

Authors:  John T Cacioppo; Louise C Hawkley; Greg J Norman; Gary G Berntson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Perceived social isolation, evolutionary fitness and health outcomes: a lifespan approach.

Authors:  Louise C Hawkley; John P Capitanio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Biological pathways and genetic mechanisms involved in social functioning.

Authors:  Juan R Ordoñana; Meike Bartels; Dorret I Boomsma; David Cella; Miriam Mosing; Joao R Oliveira; Donald L Patrick; Ruut Veenhoven; Gert G Wagner; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The social network of loneliness.

Authors:  M Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Alone in the crowd: the structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network.

Authors:  John T Cacioppo; James H Fowler; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-12

8.  Genome-Wide Association Study of Loneliness Demonstrates a Role for Common Variation.

Authors:  Jianjun Gao; Lea K Davis; Amy B Hart; Sandra Sanchez-Roige; Lide Han; John T Cacioppo; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Familial resemblance for loneliness.

Authors:  Marijn A Distel; Irene Rebollo-Mesa; Abdel Abdellaoui; Catherine A Derom; Gonneke Willemsen; John T Cacioppo; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Spirituality and autonomic cardiac control.

Authors:  Gary G Berntson; Greg J Norman; Louise C Hawkley; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.