Literature DB >> 1627217

Sucking patterns of neonates during bottle feeding: comparison of different nipple units.

O P Mathew1, M Belan, C K Thoppil.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to compare the sucking pattern of term and preterm infants during bottle feeding with different types of nipple units (Enfamil single-hole nipple units for term and preterm infants and SMA Nuk nipple units). In addition, the sucking pattern of term neonates during a feeding regimen commonly used in many feeding studies was evaluated (reservoir nipple system). In this system milk flows from a reservoir through a tube and depends on the sucking pressure generated by the infant. Only the Enfamil single-hole nipple units for term and preterm infants were compared in preterm infants. No significant difference in sucking frequency was observed in term neonates with different types of nipple units. Although the mean sucking pressures generated tended to be less among nipple units with higher flow, these differences were not statistically significant. Similarly, no significant difference in total sucking or feeding time was observed among the three nipple units tested. Sucking pressures generated by term infants were significantly less when milk flow was increased markedly utilizing the reservoir system. In preterm infants no differences in sucking frequency, sucking pressure, mean flow, or total feeding time were observed when sucking patterns with term and preterm nipple units were compared. Implications of these findings in feeding neonates are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1627217     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  9 in total

1.  Milk Flow Rates From Bottle Nipples Used for Feeding Infants Who Are Hospitalized.

Authors:  Britt F Pados; Jinhee Park; Suzanne M Thoyre; Hayley Estrem; W Brant Nix
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Does the choice of bottle nipple affect the oral feeding performance of very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants?

Authors:  C E Scheel; Richard J Schanler; Chantal Lau
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.299

3.  Mechanics of sucking: comparison between bottle feeding and breastfeeding.

Authors:  Angel Moral; Ignasi Bolibar; Gloria Seguranyes; Josep M Ustrell; Gloria Sebastiá; Cristina Martínez-Barba; Jose Ríos
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  The physiologic coupling of sucking and swallowing coordination provides a unique process for neonatal survival.

Authors:  Katlyn E McGrattan; Maneesha Sivalingam; Kathryn A Hasenstab; Lai Wei; Sudarshan R Jadcherla
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.299

5.  Effects of opaque, weighted bottles on maternal sensitivity and infant intake.

Authors:  Alison K Ventura; Alexandra Hernandez
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Capturing infant swallow impairment on videofluoroscopy: timing matters.

Authors:  Katlyn Elizabeth McGrattan; Heather C McGhee; Keeley L McKelvey; Clarice S Clemmens; Elizabeth G Hill; Allan DeToma; Jeanne G Hill; Cephus E Simmons; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-18

7.  Maturation of oral feeding skills in preterm infants.

Authors:  N Amaizu; Rj Shulman; Rj Schanler; C Lau
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.299

8.  Effect of Single-Use, Laser-Cut, Slow-Flow Nipples on Respiration and Milk Ingestion in Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Katlyn E McGrattan; David H McFarland; Jesse C Dean; Elizabeth Hill; David R White; Bonnie Martin-Harris
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Sucking behaviour using feeding teats with and without an anticolic system: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Marina Kreitschmann; Lea C Epping; Ariane Hohoff; Cristina Sauerland; Thomas Stamm
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.125

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.