Literature DB >> 16272054

Cost-effectiveness analysis of PMMA, silicone, or acrylic intra-ocular lenses in cataract surgery in four European countries.

Andrew F Smith1, Antoine Lafuma, Gilles Berdeaux, Patrizia Berto, Bernd Brueggenjuergen, Sol Magaz, Gerd K Auffarth, Antoine Brezin, Aldo Caporossi, Javier Mendicute.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of different intra-ocular lens (IOL) materials (Hydrophobic acrylic, Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), Hydrophilic acrylic and Silicone) implanted after cataract surgery with reference to Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy and Nd:YAG-related complications in four European countries (France, Italy, Germany and Spain).
SETTING: A retrospective review of 1,525 patients (eyes), aged 50 to 80 years, operated with phacoemulsification for cataract in 1996 or 1997 in 16 surgical centres (4 per country).
METHODS: The study was conducted using a cost-effectiveness approach. Medical charts were reviewed to collect retrospective information during the 3-year period following cataract surgery in order to identify patients who underwent Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy post-operatively. Clinical data were combined with unit costs assessed by experts for Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy and their complications. A cost-effectiveness ratio (cost per patient without Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy intervention) was estimated in relation to each IOL material used in each of the four European countries.
RESULTS: Hydrophobic acrylic, specifically Acrysof, was the most cost-effective IOL material in all the countries except Germany where it was second. PMMA had the best ratio in Germany, was second in Spain and only third in Italy and France. Silicone was second in France and ranked third in the other countries, while hydrophilic acrylic had the worst ratio overall in all countries.
CONCLUSIONS: Cost-effectiveness ratios of hydrophobic acrylic (Acrysof) were better than those of other types of IOL materials used in most of the countries. Sensitivity analyses were performed to vary the base case analysis to demonstrate the economic importance of the assumptions. In all cases, hydrophobic acrylic IOL material was shown to be a highly cost-effective option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16272054     DOI: 10.1080/09286580500180598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol        ISSN: 0928-6586            Impact factor:   1.648


  7 in total

1.  Cost of cataract surgery after implantation of three intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Catherine Boureau; Antoine Lafuma; Viviane Jeanbat; Andrew F Smith; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02

2.  Intraocular lenses for the treatment of age-related cataracts: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-10-01

3.  Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization Associated with Posterior Capsule Opacification After Cataract Surgery with Five Different Intraocular Lenses: An Economic Analysis for Spain.

Authors:  José I Belda; Javier Placeres; Juan Carlos Elvira; Xavier Puig; Caridad Pérez-Vives; Ming Zou; Shaohui Sun; Jing Yu; Derek O'Boyle
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-31

4.  German claims data analysis to assess impact of different intraocular lenses on posterior capsule opacification and related healthcare costs.

Authors:  Nils Kossack; Christian Schindler; Ines Weinhold; Lennart Hickstein; Moritz Lehne; Jochen Walker; Aljoscha S Neubauer; Dennis Häckl
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2017-10-24

5.  Budget impact analysis of lens material on the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) as a complication after the cataract surgery.

Authors:  Monika Raulinajtys-Grzybek; Iwona Grabska-Liberek; Aleksandra Opala; Marta Słomka; Michał Chrobot
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2020-06-16

6.  A meta-analysis of Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates for two hydrophobic intraocular lens materials.

Authors:  Mark Von Tress; James S Marotta; Stephen S Lane; Ramesh Sarangapani
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-22

7.  Comparing the long-term impact on health care resources utilization and costs due to various single-piece acrylic monofocal intraocular lens implantation during cataract surgery: a cost-consequence analysis for the United Kingdom, Italy, and Denmark.

Authors:  Mukesh Dhariwal; Christine Bouchet; Shantanu Jawla
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.