Literature DB >> 16271778

Prediction of necessity for coronary artery revascularization by adenosine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Peter Bernhardt1, Thomas Engels, Benny Levenson, Katrin Haase, Alexander Albrecht, Oliver Strohm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessing myocardial first-pass wash-in during pharmacological induced stress allows detection of perfusion deficits and indicates stenotic coronary arteries (CA). The aim of our study was to demonstrate clinical relevance of contrast-enhanced stress magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) by predicting necessity of CA intervention.
METHODS: 738 patients with scheduled coronary angiography (CXA) were scanned in a 1.5 Tesla CMR scanner. After 3 min of adenosine infusion (140 microg/kg/min), first-pass kinetic of contrast agent was evaluated. Myocardial necrosis was visualized with "myocardial late enhancement (MLE)". Perfusion deficits were described as either "ischemia in viable myocardium", or "no relevant ischemia in viable myocardium" or as "ischemia in chronic myocardial infarction (CMI)" based on spatial and temporal extent of ischemia and of MLE. CXA was performed in all patients within 48 h after CMR and revascularization, if applicable, was performed. Angiograms were read by two independent and blinded investigators and matched with CMR findings.
RESULTS: 539 patients (73%) showed "ischemia in viable myocardium" and revascularization was performed in 513 patients (95%). In 111 patients with "no relevant ischemia in viable myocardium", revascularization was performed in only 5 patients (5%). In 88 patients classified as "ischemia in CMI", revascularization was performed in 14 patients (16%). Positive predictive value of CMR for CA intervention was 0.95, negative predictive value was 0.89, sensitivity was 0.96, and specificity was 0.87.
CONCLUSION: CMR allows clinical useful prediction of relevant CA disease with need for revascularization prior to CXA and may be used as non-invasive test for myocardial ischemia and viability to guide further therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16271778     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.08.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  12 in total

1.  Clinical implication of adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as potential gatekeeper prior to invasive examination in patients with AHA/ACC class II indication for coronary angiography.

Authors:  Guenter Pilz; Peter Bernhardt; Markus Klos; Eman Ali; Michael Wild; Berthold Höfling
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Contrast-enhanced adenosine-stress magnetic resonance imaging--feasibility and practicability of a protocol for detection or exclusion of ischemic heart disease in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  P Bernhardt; B Levenson; T Engels; O Strohm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Head-to-head comparison of first-pass MR perfusion imaging during adenosine and high-dose dobutamine/atropine stress.

Authors:  Robert Manka; Cosima Jahnke; Rolf Gebker; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Ingo Paetsch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion for detection of coronary artery stenoses by steady-state, free-precession magnetic resonance first-pass imaging.

Authors:  Nico Merkle; Jochen Wöhrle; Olaf Grebe; Thorsten Nusser; Markus Kunze; Hans A Kestler; Matthias Kochs; Vinzenz Hombach
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) and Computed Tomography (CCT) in Facilitating Heart Failure Management.

Authors:  R Brandon Stacey; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

6.  Comparison of centric and reverse-centric trajectories for highly accelerated three-dimensional saturation recovery cardiac perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Haonan Wang; Neal K Bangerter; Daniel J Park; Ganesh Adluru; Eugene G Kholmovski; Jian Xu; Edward DiBella
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Inter-observer variability of visual analysis of "stress"-only adenosine first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging in relation to clinical experience and reading criteria.

Authors:  D D Lubbers; D Kuijpers; R Bodewes; P Kappert; M Kerkhof; P M A van Ooijen; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Performance of adenosine "stress-only" perfusion MRI in patients without a history of myocardial infarction: a clinical outcome study.

Authors:  Daniel D Lubbers; Dorine Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Marjan Kerkhof; Paul E Sijens; Paul R M van Dijkman; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Angiographic correlations of patients with small vessel disease diagnosed by adenosine-stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guenter Pilz; Markus Klos; Eman Ali; Berthold Hoefling; Roland Scheck; Peter Bernhardt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Three dimensional first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging at 3T: feasibility study.

Authors:  Taehoon Shin; Houchun H Hu; Gerald M Pohost; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.