Literature DB >> 16271369

Spatial mosaic formation through frequency-dependent selection in Müllerian mimicry complexes.

Thomas N Sherratt1.   

Abstract

Although contemporary models of Müllerian mimicry have considered the movement of interfacial boundaries between two distinct mimetic forms, and even the possibility of polymorphisms in two patch systems, no model has considered how multiple forms of Müllerian mimics might evolve and be maintained over large geographical areas. A spatially explicit individual-based model for the evolution of Müllerian mimicry is presented, in which two unpalatable species are distributed over discrete cells within a regular lattice. Populations in each cell are capable of genetic drift and experience localized dispersal as well as frequency-dependent selection by predators. When each unpalatable prey species was introduced into a random cell and allowed to spread, then mimicry evolved throughout the system in the form of a spatial mosaic of phenotypes, separated by narrow "hybrid zones". The primary mechanism generating phenotypic diversity was the occasional establishment of new mutant forms in unoccupied cells and their subsequent maintenance (and spread) through frequency-dependent selection. The mean number of discrete clusters of the same morph that formed in the lattice was higher the higher the intensity of predation, and higher the lower the dispersal rate of unpalatable prey. Under certain conditions the hybrid zones moved, in a direction dependent on the curvature of their interfacial boundaries. However, the mimetic mosaics were highly stable when the intensity of predation was high and the rate of prey dispersal was low. Overall, this model highlights how a stable mosaic of different mimetic forms can evolve from a range of starting conditions through a combination of chance effects and localized frequency-dependent selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16271369     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  9 in total

1.  Maintaining mimicry diversity: optimal warning colour patterns differ among microhabitats in Amazonian clearwing butterflies.

Authors:  Keith R Willmott; Julia C Robinson Willmott; Marianne Elias; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Unsupervised machine learning reveals mimicry complexes in bumblebees occur along a perceptual continuum.

Authors:  Briana D Ezray; Drew C Wham; Carrie E Hill; Heather M Hines
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  The evolution of Müllerian mimicry.

Authors:  Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-10

4.  Wright's shifting balance theory and the diversification of aposematic signals.

Authors:  Mathieu Chouteau; Bernard Angers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Unravelling the role of host plant expansion in the diversification of a Neotropical butterfly genus.

Authors:  Melanie McClure; Marianne Elias
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Deep learning on butterfly phenotypes tests evolution's oldest mathematical model.

Authors:  Jennifer F Hoyal Cuthill; Nicholas Guttenberg; Sophie Ledger; Robyn Crowther; Blanca Huertas
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Scale-dependent environmental effects on phenotypic distributions in Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Ananda R Pereira Martins; Lucas P Martins; Wing-Zheng Ho; William Owen McMillan; Jonathan S Ready; Rowan Barrett
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Joint effects of female preference intensity and frequency-dependent predation on the polymorphism maintenance in aposematic sexual traits.

Authors:  Aditya Ponkshe; John A Endler
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 3.167

9.  The genomics of mimicry: Gene expression throughout development provides insights into convergent and divergent phenotypes in a Müllerian mimicry system.

Authors:  Adam M M Stuckert; Mathieu Chouteau; Melanie McClure; Troy M LaPolice; Tyler Linderoth; Rasmus Nielsen; Kyle Summers; Matthew D MacManes
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 6.622

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.