Literature DB >> 16270218

Kinetochore fiber formation in animal somatic cells: dueling mechanisms come to a draw.

Conly L Rieder1.   

Abstract

The attachment to and movement of a chromosome on the mitotic spindle are mediated by the formation of a bundle of microtubules (MTs) that tethers the kinetochore on the chromosome to a spindle pole. The origin of these "kinetochore fibers" (K fibers) has been investigated for over 125 years. As noted in 1944 by Schrader [Mitosis, Columbia University Press, New York, 110 pp.], there are three possible ways to form a K fiber: (a) it grows from the pole until it contacts the kinetochore, (b) it grows directly from the kinetochore, or (c) it forms as a result of an interaction between the pole and the chromosome. Since Schrader's time, it has been firmly established that K fibers in centrosome-containing animal somatic cells form as kinetochores capture MTs growing from the spindle pole (route a). It is now similarly clear that in cells lacking centrosomes, including higher plants and many animal oocytes, K fibers "self-assemble" from MTs generated by the chromosomes (route b). Can animal somatic cells form K fibers in the absence of centrosomes by the "self-assembly" pathway? In 2000, the answer to this question was shown to be a resounding "yes." With this result, the next question became whether the presence of a centrosome normally suppresses K fiber self-assembly or if this route works concurrently with centrosome-mediated K-fiber formation. This question, too, has recently been answered: observations on untreated live animal cells expressing green fluorescent protein-tagged tubulin clearly show that kinetochores can nucleate the formation of their associated MTs in a unique manner in the presence of functional centrosomes. The concurrent operation of these two "dueling" routes for forming K fibers in animal cells helps explain why the attachment of kinetochores and the maturation of K fibers occur as quickly as they do on all chromosomes within a cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16270218      PMCID: PMC2570760          DOI: 10.1007/s00412-005-0028-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  67 in total

1.  Requirement of a centrosomal activity for cell cycle progression through G1 into S phase.

Authors:  E H Hinchcliffe; F J Miller; M Cham; A Khodjakov; G Sluder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Assembly of microtubules onto kinetochores of isolated mitotic chromosomes of HeLa cells.

Authors:  B R Telzer; M J Moses; J L Rosenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Drosophila CLASP is required for the incorporation of microtubule subunits into fluxing kinetochore fibres.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Alexey Khodjakov; Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2004-12-12       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  T Mitchison; L Evans; E Schulze; M Kirschner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-05-23       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The ultrastructure and spatial organization of the metaphase kinetochore in mitotic rat cells.

Authors:  P T Jokelainen
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1967-07

6.  Structure of kinetochore fibers: microtubule continuity and inter-microtubule bridges.

Authors:  P L Witt; H Ris; G G Borisy
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber.

Authors:  C L Rieder
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1982

8.  Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately disassemble from their kinetochore ends.

Authors:  G J Gorbsky; P J Sammak; G G Borisy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Electron microscope study of mitosis in sea urchin blastomeres.

Authors:  P HARRIS
Journal:  J Biophys Biochem Cytol       Date:  1961-11

10.  Kinetochore structure, duplication, and distribution in mammalian cells: analysis by human autoantibodies from scleroderma patients.

Authors:  S Brenner; D Pepper; M W Berns; E Tan; B R Brinkley
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Reaction-diffusion systems in intracellular molecular transport and control.

Authors:  Siowling Soh; Marta Byrska; Kristiana Kandere-Grzybowska; Bartosz A Grzybowski
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Model of chromosome motility in Drosophila embryos: adaptation of a general mechanism for rapid mitosis.

Authors:  G Civelekoglu-Scholey; D J Sharp; A Mogilner; J M Scholey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Localized RanGTP accumulation promotes microtubule nucleation at kinetochores in somatic mammalian cells.

Authors:  Liliana Torosantucci; Maria De Luca; Giulia Guarguaglini; Patrizia Lavia; Francesca Degrassi
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Kinetochore dynein is required for chromosome motion and congression independent of the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Zhenye Yang; U Serdar Tulu; Patricia Wadsworth; Conly L Rieder
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Mitosis: spindle evolution and the matrix model.

Authors:  Jeremy Pickett-Heaps; Art Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 6.  Bi-orienting chromosomes: acrobatics on the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Tomoyuki U Tanaka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Tension-sensitive Plk1 phosphorylation on BubR1 regulates the stability of kinetochore microtubule interactions.

Authors:  Sabine Elowe; Stefan Hümmer; Andreas Uldschmid; Xiuling Li; Erich A Nigg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  Mechanisms of plant spindle formation.

Authors:  Han Zhang; R Kelly Dawe
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  50 ways to build a spindle: the complexity of microtubule generation during mitosis.

Authors:  Tommy Duncan; James G Wakefield
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Aurora kinase inhibitors reveal mechanisms of HURP in nucleation of centrosomal and kinetochore microtubules.

Authors:  Jiun-Ming Wu; Chiung-Tong Chen; Mohane Selvaraj Coumar; Wen-Hsin Lin; Zi-Jie Chen; John T-A Hsu; Yi-Hui Peng; Hui-Yi Shiao; Wen-Hsing Lin; Chang-Ying Chu; Jian-Sung Wu; Chih-Tsung Lin; Ching-Ping Chen; Ching-Cheng Hsueh; Kai-Yen Chang; Li-Pin Kao; Chi-Ying F Huang; Yu-Sheng Chao; Su-Ying Wu; Hsing-Pang Hsieh; Ya-Hui Chi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.