Literature DB >> 16269711

Detection of infectious Cryptosporidium oocysts by cell culture immunofluorescence assay: applicability to environmental samples.

F M Schets1, G B Engels, M During, A M de Roda Husman.   

Abstract

In the past few years many waterborne outbreaks related to Cryptosporidium have been described. Current methods for detection of Cryptosporidium in water for the most part rely on viability assays which are not informative concerning the infectivity of oocysts. However, for estimation of the risk of infection with Cryptosporidium this information is required. For environmental samples the oocyst counts are often low, and the oocysts have been exposed to unfavorable conditions. Therefore, determination of the infectivity of environmental oocysts requires an assay with a high level of sensitivity. We evaluated the applicability of in vitro cell culture immunofluorescence assays with HCT-8 and Caco-2 cells for determination of oocyst infectivity in naturally contaminated water samples. Cell culture assays were compared with other viability and infectivity assays. Experiments with Cryptosporidium oocysts from different sources revealed that there was considerable variability in infectivity, which was illustrated by variable 50% infective doses, which ranged from 40 to 614 oocysts, and the results indicated that not only relatively large numbers of fresh oocysts but also aged oocysts produced infection in cell cultures. Fifteen Dutch surface water samples were tested, and the cell culture immunofluorescence assays were not capable of determining the infectivity for the low numbers of naturally occurring Cryptosporidium oocysts present in the samples. A comparison with other viability assays, such as the vital dye exclusion assay, demonstrated that surrogate methods overestimate the number of infectious oocysts and therefore the risk of infection with Cryptosporidium. For accurate risk assessment, further improvement of the method for detection of Cryptosporidium in water is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269711      PMCID: PMC1287702          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6793-6798.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  23 in total

1.  Assessment of methods for detection of infectious Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in reclaimed effluents.

Authors:  W Quintero-Betancourt; A L Gennaccaro; T M Scott; J B Rose
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of tests for viable and infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.

Authors:  M Jenkins; J M Trout; J Higgins; M Dorsch; D Veal; R Fayer
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Comparison of tissue culture and animal models for assessment of Cryptospridium parvum infection.

Authors:  Theresa R Slifko; Debra E Huffman; Bertrand Dussert; James H Owens; Walter Jakubowski; Charles N Haas; Joan B Rose
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.011

4.  Intact Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts isolated after in vitro excystation are infectious to neonatal mice.

Authors:  N F Neumann; L L Gyürék; G R Finch; M Belosevic
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 5.  Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium: transmission, detection and identification.

Authors:  R Fayer; U Morgan; S J Upton
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.981

6.  Cryptosporidium dose response studies: variation between isolates.

Authors:  Peter F M Teunis; Cynthia L Chappell; Pablo C Okhuysen
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Sensor, a population-based cohort study on gastroenteritis in the Netherlands: incidence and etiology.

Authors:  M A de Wit; M P Koopmans; L M Kortbeek; W J Wannet; J Vinjé; F van Leusden; A I Bartelds; Y T van Duynhoven
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Quantitative-PCR assessment of Cryptosporidium parvum cell culture infection.

Authors:  George D Di Giovanni; Mark W LeChevallier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Comparison of in vitro cell culture and a mouse assay for measuring infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum.

Authors:  Paul A Rochelle; Marilyn M Marshall; Jan R Mead; Anne M Johnson; Dick G Korich; Jeffrey S Rosen; Ricardo De Leon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, chlorine, and monochloramine on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability.

Authors:  D G Korich; J R Mead; M S Madore; N A Sinclair; C R Sterling
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  8 in total

1.  In vitro determination of anticryptosporidial activity of phytogenic extracts and compounds.

Authors:  Klaus Teichmann; Maxime Kuliberda; Gerd Schatzmayr; Franz Hadacek; Anja Joachim
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Leaching of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts, Escherichia coli, and a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium bacteriophage through intact soil cores following surface application and injection of slurry.

Authors:  Anita Forslund; Bo Markussen; Lise Toenner-Klank; Tina B Bech; Ole Stig Jacobsen; Anders Dalsgaard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Calcium-Mediated Biophysical Binding of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts to Surfaces Is Sensitive to Oocyst Age.

Authors:  Tooba Sarkhosh; X Frank Zhang; Kristen L Jellison; Sabrina S Jedlicka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Microbial adhesion of Cryptosporidium parvum: identification of a colostrum-derived inhibitory lipid.

Authors:  Joann Schmidt; Mark S Kuhlenschmidt
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Improved risk analysis by dual direct detection of total and infectious Cryptosporidium oocysts on cell culture in combination with immunofluorescence assay.

Authors:  Cindy Lalancette; George D Di Giovanni; Michèle Prévost
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Aged HCT-8 cell monolayers support Cryptosporidium parvum infection.

Authors:  Laura Y Sifuentes; George D Di Giovanni
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Molecular Identification of Parasitic Protozoa Sarcocystis in Water Samples.

Authors:  Živilė Strazdaitė-Žielienė; Agnė Baranauskaitė; Dalius Butkauskas; Elena Servienė; Petras Prakas
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 8.  Assessing viability and infectivity of foodborne and waterborne stages (cysts/oocysts) of Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., and Toxoplasma gondii: a review of methods.

Authors:  Angélique Rousseau; Stéphanie La Carbona; Aurélien Dumètre; Lucy J Robertson; Gilles Gargala; Sandie Escotte-Binet; Loïc Favennec; Isabelle Villena; Cédric Gérard; Dominique Aubert
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.