Literature DB >> 16269564

Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification.

C Strong1.   

Abstract

Although there is widespread opposition to reproductive cloning, some have argued that its use by infertile couples to have genetically related children would be ethically justifiable. Others have suggested that lesbian or gay couples might wish to use cloning to have genetically related children. Most of the main objections to human reproductive cloning are based on the child's lack of unique nuclear DNA. In the future, it may be possible safely to create children using cloning combined with genetic modifications, so that they have unique nuclear DNA. The genetic modifications could be aimed at giving such children genetic characteristics of both members of the couple concerned. Thus, cloning combined with genetic modification could be appealing to infertile, lesbian, or gay couples who seek genetically related children who have genetic characteristics of both members. In such scenarios, the various objections to human reproductive cloning that are based on the lack of genetic uniqueness would no longer be applicable. The author argues that it would be ethically justifiable for such couples to create children in this manner, assuming these techniques could be used safely.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269564      PMCID: PMC1734050          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.011189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  17 in total

1.  Entitlement to cloning.

Authors:  T F Murphy
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Unnatural deeds do breed unnatural troubles (Macbeth: act v, scene 1).

Authors:  J B Massey; S Slayden; D M Shapiro; D Wininger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Response to "May a woman clone herself?" by Jean E. Chambers (CQ Vol 10, No 2) and "Entitlement to cloning" by Timothy F. Murphy (CQ Vol 8, No 3). Clone alone.

Authors:  Carson Strong
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Toward scientific discussion of human reproductive cloning.

Authors:  Joe Leigh Simpson
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Prenatal screening: professional standards and the limits of parental choice.

Authors:  J R Botkin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Philosophical arguments for and against human reproductive cloning.

Authors:  Matti Hayry
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 7.  Fertility preservation and management of gonadal failure associated with lymphoma therapy.

Authors:  Simon J Howell; Stephen M Shalet
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Children in lesbian and single-parent households: psychosexual and psychiatric appraisal.

Authors:  S Golombok; A Spencer; M Rutter
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 8.982

9.  Tomorrow's prenatal genetic testing. Should we test for 'minor' diseases?

Authors:  C Strong
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1993-11

10.  Human cloning: category, dignity, and the role of bioethics.

Authors:  Evelyne Shuster
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.898

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.