Literature DB >> 16269282

Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery minimizes esophageal perforation during Heller myotomy.

W Scott Melvin1, John M Dundon, Mark Talamini, Santiago Horgan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy has emerged as the treatment of choice for achalasia. However, intraoperative esophageal perforation remains a significant complication. Computer-enhanced operative techniques have the potential to improve outcomes for certain operative procedures. Robotic, computer-enhanced laparoscopic telemanipulators using 3-dimensional magnified imaging and motion scaling are designed uniquely to facilitate certain operations requiring fine-tissue manipulation. We hypothesized that computer-enhanced robotic Heller myotomy would reduce intraoperative complications compared with laparoscopic techniques.
METHODS: All patients undergoing an operation for achalasia at 3 institutions with a robotic surgery system (DaVinci; Intuitive Surgical Corporation, Sunnyvale, Calif) were followed-up prospectively. Demographics, perioperative course, complications, and hospital stay were recorded. Follow-up evaluation was obtained via a standardized symptom survey, office visits, and medical records. Data were compared with preoperative symptoms using a Mann-Whitney U test, and operating times were compared using the ANOVA test.
RESULTS: Between August 2000 and August 2004 there were 104 patients who underwent a robotic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplicaton. There were 53 women and 51 men. All patients were symptomatic. The operative time was 140.55 minutes overall, but improved from 162.63 minutes to 113.50 minutes from 2000-2002 to 2003-2004 (P = .0001). There were no esophageal perforations. There were 8 minor complications and 1 patient required conversion to an open operation. Sixty-six (62.3%) patients were discharged on the first postoperative day and the average hospital stay was 1.5 days. A symptom survey was completed in 79 of 104 patients (76%) at follow-up evaluation. Symptoms improved in all patients with an average follow-up symptom score of 0.48 compared with 5.0 before the operation (P = .0001). Forty-three of the 79 patients from whom follow-up data were collected had a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. The follow-up period averaged 16 months. No patients required reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-enhanced robotic laparoscopic techniques provide a clear advantage over standard laparoscopy for the operative treatment of achalasia. We have shown in this large series that Heller myotomy can be completed using this technology without esophageal perforation. The application of computer-enhanced operative techniques appears to provide superior outcomes in selected procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269282     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  25 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy: a modern technique and review of outcomes.

Authors:  Cheguevara Afaneh; Brendan Finnerty; Jonathan S Abelson; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-03-21

2.  Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: a case-control study.

Authors:  Alexis Sánchez; Omaira Rodríguez; Elias Nakhal; Hugo Davila; Rair Valero; Renata Sánchez; Romina Pena; Maria F Visconti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-07-08

3.  Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia: feasibility, technique, and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Carlos A Galvani; Alberto S Gallo; Mark R Dylewski
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-02-19

4.  Role of robotic-assisted surgery in benign esophageal diseases.

Authors:  Shireesh Saurabh; Eric Unger; Julie Grossman; Francisco Couto; Namrata Singh; David Scott Lind; Lucian Panait; Andres Castellanos
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-08-15

5.  Robot-assisted gastroesophageal surgery: usefulness and limitations.

Authors:  Ismael Diez Del Val; Cándido Martinez Blazquez; Carlos Loureiro Gonzalez; Jose Maria Vitores Lopez; Valentin Sierra Esteban; Julen Barrenetxea Asua; Izaskun Del Hoyo Aretxabala; Patricia Perez de Villarreal; Jose Esteban Bilbao Axpe; Jaime Jesus Mendez Martin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-09-14

Review 6.  Laparoscopic esophagomyotomy for achalasia: how I do it.

Authors:  Homero Rivas; Robert V Rege
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Utilization and outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic general and bariatric surgical procedures at Academic Medical Centers.

Authors:  James Villamere; Alana Gebhart; Stephen Vu; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).

Authors:  Shawn Tsuda; Dmitry Oleynikov; Jon Gould; Dan Azagury; Bryan Sandler; Matthew Hutter; Sharona Ross; Eric Haas; Fred Brody; Richard Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Review of robotics in foregut and bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Juan P Toro; Edward Lin; Ankit D Patel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Major complications of pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy for achalasia: single-center experience and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristle L Lynch; John E Pandolfino; Colin W Howden; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.