Literature DB >> 16269207

Changes in foot and lower limb coupling due to systematic variations in step width.

Michael B Pohl1, Neil Messenger, John G Buckley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Motion at the midfoot joints can contribute significantly to overall foot motion during gait. However, there is little information regarding the kinematic coupling relationship at the midfoot. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the coupling relationship at the midfoot and subtalar joints was affected when step width was manipulated during running.
METHODS: Twelve subjects ran over-ground at self-selected speeds using three different step widths (normal, wide, cross-over). Coupling at the midfoot (forefoot relative to rearfoot) and subtalar (rearfoot relative to shank) joints was assessed using cross-correlation techniques.
FINDINGS: Rearfoot kinematics were significantly different from normal running in cross-over running (P<0.05) but not in wide running. However, coupling between rearfoot eversion/inversion and shank rotation was consistently high (r>0.917), regardless of step width. This was also the case for coupling between rearfoot frontal plane motion and forefoot sagittal plane (r<-0.852) and forefoot transverse plane (r>0.946) motion. There was little evidence of coupling between rearfoot frontal plane motion and forefoot frontal plane motion in any of the conditions.
INTERPRETATION: Forefoot frontal plane motion appeared to have little effect on rearfoot frontal plane motion and thus, had no effect on motion at the subtalar joint. The strong coupling of forefoot sagittal and transverse plane motions with rearfoot frontal plane motion suggests that forefoot motion exerts an important influence on subtalar joint kinematics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269207     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  8 in total

1.  Gait kinematics after taping in participants with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Lisa Chinn; Jay Dicharry; Joseph M Hart; Susan Saliba; Robert Wilder; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Correlation varies with different time lags between the motions of the hyoid bone, epiglottis, and larynx during swallowing.

Authors:  Han Gil Seo; Byung-Mo Oh; Ja-Ho Leigh; Tai Ryoon Han
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  The role of tibialis posterior fatigue on foot kinematics during walking.

Authors:  Michael B Pohl; Melissa Rabbito; Reed Ferber
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Changes in joint coupling and variability during walking following tibialis posterior muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Reed Ferber; Michael B Pohl
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Lower extremity kinematics in children with and without flexible flatfoot: a comparative study.

Authors:  Yi-Fen Shih; Chao-Yin Chen; Wen-Yin Chen; Hsiu-Chen Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Preliminary Evidence That Taping Does Not Optimize Joint Coupling of the Foot and Ankle Joints in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Charles Deltour; Bart Dingenen; Filip Staes; Kevin Deschamps; Giovanni A Matricali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect V2 Sensor for Human Gait Analysis. A Different Approach for Comparison with the Ground Truth.

Authors:  Diego Guffanti; Alberto Brunete; Miguel Hernando; Javier Rueda; Enrique Navarro Cabello
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  Dynamic Knee Valgus in Single-Leg Movement Tasks. Potentially Modifiable Factors and Exercise Training Options. A Literature Review.

Authors:  Bartosz Wilczyński; Katarzyna Zorena; Daniel Ślęzak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.