Literature DB >> 16269172

The role of hybrid PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with cervical cancer.

Amnon Amit1, Dan Beck, Lior Lowenstein, Offer Lavie, Rachel Bar Shalom, Zohar Kedar, Ora Israel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of hybrid PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with cervical cancer.
METHODS: 75 patients divided into 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of 16 patients prior to radical surgery. Group 2 consisted of 31 patients prior to pelvic radiotherapy. Group 3 had 28 patients who underwent the examination secondary to suspected recurrent disease. Whole body PET and CT were performed respectively on the same device 1 h after injection of 10 mCi FDG. PET/CT results were correlated to histological, radiological and clinical follow-up data. Only women with >6 months follow-up were included.
RESULTS: In 33 patients, pathohistological examinations for extra cervical lesions were obtained. Correlation with PET/CT examination revealed levels of sensitivity (60%), specificity (94%), positive (90%) and negative predictive values (74%). The examination indicated 21 patients with extrapelvic and/or metastatic disease. The follow-up data of this group revealed that 20 patients either died or were alive with active disease, and only one patient was in clinical remission. PET/CT yielded an improved diagnosis for both PET and CT in 43% of the cases by providing better localization and definition of abnormal FDG uptake.
CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid PET/CT was found to be of value for detection of cervical cancer metastases, decision-making and planning of irradiation therapy. Using this modality may reduce unnecessary surgical interventions, help modify radiation fields and change therapeutic approaches. Detection of advanced diseases on PET/CT correlates with poor prognosis. However, this examination is less accurate in detecting microscopic diseases and lesions smaller than 1.5 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269172     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of molecular markers of hypoxia and imaging with (60)Cu-ATSM in cancer of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Perry W Grigsby; Robert S Malyapa; Ryuji Higashikubo; Julie K Schwarz; Michael J Welch; Phyllis C Huettner; Farrokh Dehdashti
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Imaging across the life span: innovations in imaging and therapy for gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Meng Xu-Welliver; William T C Yuh; Julia R Fielding; Katarzyna J Macura; Zhibin Huang; Ahmet S Ayan; Floor J Backes; Guang Jia; Mariam Moshiri; Jun Zhang; Nina A Mayr
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  F-18 FDG PET Images of the Cervix at Various Time Points after the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.

Authors:  Shin Young Jeong; Jung-Joon Min
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-26

4.  Efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Erik Mittra; Tarek El-Maghraby; Cesar A Rodriguez; Andrew Quon; I Ross McDougall; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Microvessel density and p53 in detecting cervical cancer by FDG PET in cases of suspected recurrence.

Authors:  Astrid A M van der Veldt; Lotty Hooft; Paul J van Diest; Johannes Berkhof; Marrije R Buist; Emile F I Comans; Otto S Hoekstra; Carla F M Molthoff
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Positron emission tomography alone, positron emission tomography-computed tomography and computed tomography in diagnosing recurrent cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Xiao; Jia Wei; Yicheng Zhang; Weining Xiong
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 7.  Follow-up protocols for women with cervical cancer after primary treatment.

Authors:  Anne Lanceley; Alison Fiander; Mary McCormack; Andrew Bryant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-11-25

8.  A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Qian Luo; Lan Luo; Liang Tang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.