Literature DB >> 16268393

Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems.

Annie J St-Georges1, Marc Bolla, Daniel Fortin, Michelle Muller-Bolla, Jeffrey Y Thompson, Perry J Stamatiades.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the surface finish of three direct resin composites polished with three different systems. Disk-shaped specimens (n=16 per material; phi=8.0 mm x h=2.0 mm) were formed in a stainless steel mold by packing uncured material, either a hybrid composite (Z250, 3M ESPE) or two micro-hybrid composites (Point 4, Kerr; Esthet-X, Dentsply), and light-cured from the top and the bottom surfaces with a light-emitting diode (LED) curing unit (NRG, Dentsply). After storing the specimens in deionized water at 37 degrees C for seven days, one side of each specimen was finished through 1200-grit SiC abrasive (Buehler). Five specimens of each resin composite were randomly assigned to one of the three polishing systems (Identoflex, Kerr; Pogo, Dentsply; Sof-Lex, 3M ESPE). Manufacturers' instructions were followed during the polishing procedures. The average surface roughness (Ra) was determined by generating tracings across the polished surface of each disk using a scanning profilometer (Surfanalyzer System 5000, Federal Products Co). The results were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann and Whitney tests (p < or = 0.05). The smoothest surfaces were produced with the celluloid strip (control group) on all the resin composites tested. The aluminum oxide disks (Sof-Lex) produced a statistically equivalent surface finish (Ra) on the three resin composites. The lowest mean roughness values were recorded with diamond micropolisher disks (PoGo) on the hybrid composite (Z250). Overall, the two new polishing systems, Identoflex and PoGo, created a comparable surface finish to that produced by the Sof-Lex system on all three resin composites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16268393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  6 in total

1.  The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin composites.

Authors:  Kusum Bashetty; Sonal Joshi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-01

2.  In vitro evaluation of the effect of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of composite resins submitted to at-home and in-office bleaching procedures.

Authors:  Michele de Oliveira Lima; Anderson Catelan; Natália Maria Pinto Hernandes; Maria Cecília Caldas Giorgi; Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano; Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

3.  Surface geometry of various nanofiller composites using different polishing systems: A comparative study.

Authors:  Vipul Sapra; Sonali Taneja; Mohit Kumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-11

4.  Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding.

Authors:  Caöry Ulusoy
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites.

Authors:  Kristine Guará Brusaca Almeida Scheibe; Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida; Igor Studart Medeiros; José Ferreira Costa; Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 6.  Modifications in Glass Ionomer Cements: Nano-Sized Fillers and Bioactive Nanoceramics.

Authors:  Shariq Najeeb; Zohaib Khurshid; Muhammad Sohail Zafar; Abdul Samad Khan; Sana Zohaib; Juan Manuel Nuñez Martí; Salvatore Sauro; Jukka Pekka Matinlinna; Ihtesham Ur Rehman
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.