Literature DB >> 16267812

Systematic comparison of surface coatings for protein microarrays.

Birgit Guilleaume1, Andreas Buness, Christian Schmidt, Fritz Klimek, Gerhard Moldenhauer, Wolfgang Huber, Dorit Arlt, Ulrike Korf, Stefan Wiemann, Annemarie Poustka.   

Abstract

To process large numbers of samples in parallel is one potential of protein microarrays for research and diagnostics. However, the application of protein arrays is currently hampered by the lack of comprehensive technological knowledge about the suitability of 2-D and 3-D slide surface coatings. We have performed a systematic study to analyze how both surface types perform in combination with different fluorescent dyes to generate significant and reproducible data. In total, we analyzed more than 100 slides containing 1152 spots each. Slides were probed against different monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and recombinant fusion proteins. We found two surface coatings to be most suitable for protein and antibody (Ab) immobilization. These were further subjected to quantitative analyses by evaluating intraslide and slide-to-slide reproducibilities, and the linear range of target detection. In summary, we demonstrate that only suitable combinations of surface and fluorescent dyes allow the generation of highly reproducible data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16267812     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200401324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  7 in total

Review 1.  Reverse phase protein microarrays advance to use in clinical trials.

Authors:  Claudius Mueller; Lance A Liotta; Virginia Espina
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  A protein multiplex microarray substrate with high sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  Dolores A Fici; William McCormick; David W Brown; John E Herrmann; Vikram Kumar; Zuheir L Awdeh
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  High-throughput allogeneic antibody detection using protein microarrays.

Authors:  Jed Paul; Bita Sahaf; Spenser Perloff; Kelsi Schoenrock; Fang Wu; Hideki Nakasone; John Coller; David Miklos
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Peptide conformations for a microarray surface-tethered epitope of the tumor suppressor p53.

Authors:  Jun Feng; Ka-Yiu Wong; Gillian C Lynch; Xiaolian Gao; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Analysis of Reverse Phase Protein Array Data: From Experimental Design towards Targeted Biomarker Discovery.

Authors:  Astrid Wachter; Stephan Bernhardt; Tim Beissbarth; Ulrike Korf
Journal:  Microarrays (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-03

6.  Tracking transcription factor complexes on DNA using total internal reflectance fluorescence protein binding microarrays.

Authors:  Andrew J Bonham; Thorsten Neumann; Matthew Tirrell; Norbert O Reich
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Protein microarrays: high-throughput tools for proteomics.

Authors:  Oda Stoevesandt; Michael J Taussig; Mingyue He
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.940

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.