BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of rifampin and ethambutol in HIV-infected patients with tuberculosis (TB) are incompletely characterized. We examined the pharmacokinetics of rifampin and ethambutol in a cohort of patients with HIV-related TB who were treated in the United States. METHODS: Serum drug concentrations were determined 2, 6, and 10 h after dosing in 36 HIV-infected patients with TB who were taking rifampin and in 49 who were taking ethambutol. Observed serum concentrations were compared with published normal ranges and published data. RESULTS: With daily dosing of rifampin (600 mg), 26 (77%) of 34 patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 59%-89%]) had a low maximum concentration of rifampin (<8 microg/mL), and 12 (35%; 95% CI, 20%-54%) had a very low maximum concentration (<4 microg/mL). With intermittent rifampin dosing (600 mg), 13 (68%) of 19 patients (95% CI, 44%-85%) had a low maximum concentration of rifampin, and 5 (26%; 95% CI, 11%-50%) had a very low maximum concentration. With daily ethambutol dosing (20 mg/kg), 33 (69%) of 48 patients (95% CI, 55%-81%) had a low maximum concentration of ethambutol (<2 microg/mL), and 18 (38%; 95% CI, 24%-53%) had a very low maximum concentration (<1 microg/mL). With intermittent ethambutol dosing (50 mg/kg twice weekly or 30 mg/kg thrice weekly), 13 (72%) of 18 patients (95% CI, 47%-88%) had a low maximum concentration of ethambutol (<4 microg/mL), and 5 (28%; 95% CI, 12%-54%]) had a very low maximum concentration (<2 microg/mL). CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infected patients with TB who are receiving rifampin and ethambutol, low maximum concentrations of rifampin and ethambutol were common. For patients with HIV-related TB, therapeutic monitoring of rifampin and ethambutol levels may help clinicians achieve target serum concentrations.
BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of rifampin and ethambutol in HIV-infectedpatients with tuberculosis (TB) are incompletely characterized. We examined the pharmacokinetics of rifampin and ethambutol in a cohort of patients with HIV-related TB who were treated in the United States. METHODS: Serum drug concentrations were determined 2, 6, and 10 h after dosing in 36 HIV-infectedpatients with TB who were taking rifampin and in 49 who were taking ethambutol. Observed serum concentrations were compared with published normal ranges and published data. RESULTS: With daily dosing of rifampin (600 mg), 26 (77%) of 34 patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 59%-89%]) had a low maximum concentration of rifampin (<8 microg/mL), and 12 (35%; 95% CI, 20%-54%) had a very low maximum concentration (<4 microg/mL). With intermittent rifampin dosing (600 mg), 13 (68%) of 19 patients (95% CI, 44%-85%) had a low maximum concentration of rifampin, and 5 (26%; 95% CI, 11%-50%) had a very low maximum concentration. With daily ethambutol dosing (20 mg/kg), 33 (69%) of 48 patients (95% CI, 55%-81%) had a low maximum concentration of ethambutol (<2 microg/mL), and 18 (38%; 95% CI, 24%-53%) had a very low maximum concentration (<1 microg/mL). With intermittent ethambutol dosing (50 mg/kg twice weekly or 30 mg/kg thrice weekly), 13 (72%) of 18 patients (95% CI, 47%-88%) had a low maximum concentration of ethambutol (<4 microg/mL), and 5 (28%; 95% CI, 12%-54%]) had a very low maximum concentration (<2 microg/mL). CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infectedpatients with TB who are receiving rifampin and ethambutol, low maximum concentrations of rifampin and ethambutol were common. For patients with HIV-related TB, therapeutic monitoring of rifampin and ethambutol levels may help clinicians achieve target serum concentrations.
Authors: Justin J Wilkins; Radojka M Savic; Mats O Karlsson; Grant Langdon; Helen McIlleron; Goonaseelan Pillai; Peter J Smith; Ulrika S H Simonsson Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2008-04-07 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sampson Antwi; Hongmei Yang; Anthony Enimil; Anima M Sarfo; Fizza S Gillani; Daniel Ansong; Albert Dompreh; Antoinette Orstin; Theresa Opoku; Dennis Bosomtwe; Lubbe Wiesner; Jennifer Norman; Charles A Peloquin; Awewura Kwara Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Emmanuel Chigutsa; Marianne E Visser; Elizabeth C Swart; Paolo Denti; Sudeep Pushpakom; Deirdre Egan; Nicholas H G Holford; Peter J Smith; Gary Maartens; Andrew Owen; Helen McIlleron Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Anne F Luetkemeyer; Haileyesus Getahun; Gabriel Chamie; Christian Lienhardt; Diane V Havlir Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Zahoor Ahmad; Eric L Nuermberger; Rokeya Tasneen; Michael L Pinn; Kathy N Williams; Charles A Peloquin; Jacques H Grosset; Petros C Karakousis Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2010-01-31 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Sylvain Goutelle; Laurent Bourguignon; Pascal H Maire; Michael Van Guilder; John E Conte; Roger W Jelliffe Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2009-04-20 Impact factor: 5.191