| Literature DB >> 16267655 |
Ivan Planas-Miret1, Ana Tur-Prats, Jaume Puig-Junoy.
Abstract
This contribution presents entitlements and benefits, decision criteria, and involved actors for services of curative care in Spain. It describes basic benefits included in the category of curative care defined by the central government and any additional benefits that some autonomous communities (ACs) have included to enlarge their own basket. It is concluded that there is no specific and explicit benefit catalogue. As no user charges exist for this category, waiting times serve as the main cost containment tool. There is a need for further legislation, as inequalities may increase across the territory as a matter of fact. Inequalities in access to health care resources between ACs are not due to differences in health baskets but mainly to the availability of technologies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16267655 PMCID: PMC1388087 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-005-0321-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Health Econ ISSN: 1618-7598
Benefit-defining laws/decrees and catalogues and the implicit regulation by sector. I
| General Health Act | Royal Decree 63/95 | Law 16/03 | Ministerial Decree 30 April 1997 | Ministerial Decree 3 June 1998 | Ministerial Decree 3 March 1999 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional categories | ||||||
| HC.1.1 | + | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.1.2 | + | + | – | – | – | |
| HC.1.3 | + | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.1.3.1 | + | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.1.3.2 | + | + | – | – | – | |
| HC.1.3.3 | + | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.1.3.4 | + | + | + | – | – | |
| HC.1.4 | + | + | + | – | + | + |
| HC.2.1 | + | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.2.2 | + | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.2.3 | + | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.2.4 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| HC.3 | – | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.4.1 | – | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.4.2 | – | + | + | – | – | – |
| HC.4.3 | – | + | + | – | – | – |
| Legal status | Law | Presidential Decree | Law | Ministry Decree | Ministry Decree | Ministry Decree |
| Decision maker | Parliament | Government | Parliament | Government | Government | Government |
| Degree of explicitnessa | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Positive/negative definition of benefits | P | P | P | P | P | P |
| Original purpose | General definition of entitlements | Basket | Equality among citizens and ACs | Basket | Basket | Basket |
| Criteria used for defining benefits | ||||||
| Need | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Costs | – | + | + | + | + | + |
| Effectiveness | – | + | + | + | + | + |
| Cost-effectiveness | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Budget | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Updating | No | No | No | Regularly | Regularly | Regularly |
a 1, all necessary; 2, areas of care; 3, items
Benefit-defining laws/decrees and catalogues and the implicit regulation by sector. II
| General Health Act | Royal D 1663/1995 | Law 16/2003 | Decree 3157/1966 | Law 25/1990 | Royal Decree 83/1993 | Royal Decree 1663/1998 | Royal Decree 1348/2003 | Ministerial Decree 18 January 1996 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional categories | |||||||||
| HC.5.1 | + | – | – | + | + | + | + | + | – |
| HC.5.1.1 | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – |
| HC.5.1.2 | – | – | – | – | + | – | – | – | – |
| HC.5.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| HC.5.2.1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| HC.5.2.2 | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | + |
| HC.5.2.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + |
| HC.5.2.4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | + |
| HC.6.1 | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| HC.6.2 | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| HC.6.3 | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| HC.6.4 | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| HC.6.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Legal status | Law | Presidential Decree | Law | Law | Law | Presidential Decree | Presidential Decree | Presidential Decree | Ministerial Decree |
| Decision maker | Parliament | Government | Parliament | Parliament | Parliament | Government | Government | Government | Government |
| Degree of explicitnessa | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Positive/negative definition of benefits | P | P | P | P | P | N | N | N | P |
| Original purpose | General definition of entitlement | Basket | Equality among citizens and ACs | General definition of entitlement | Target rule | Exclusion | Exclusion | Exclusion | Basket |
| Criteria used for defining benefits | |||||||||
| Need | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + |
| Costs | – | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | + |
| Effectiveness | – | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | + |
| Cost-effectiveness | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Budget | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Updating | No | No | No | No | No | Regulary | Regulary | Regulary | Regulary |
a 1, all necessary; 2, areas of care; 3, items
Fig. 1Royal Decree 63/1995
Fig. 2Law 16/2003
Fig. 3Dental care catalogues: the example of Castilla La Mancha
Fig. 4Oxygen therapy at home
Spending in the provision of health care services not included in the benefit catalogue of the National Health System (Royal Decree 63/1995): proportion of total health care services spending
| 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Andalusia | 0.40 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.29 |
| Aragon | – | – | – | – | – |
| Asturias | – | – | – | 0.0003 | 0.0007 |
| Balearic Islands | – | – | – | – | 0.02 |
| Canary Island | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cantabria | – | – | – | – | – |
| Castilla y León | – | – | – | – | – |
| Castilla–La Mancha | – | – | – | – | – |
| Catalonia | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 0.27 |
| Valencia | – | – | – | – | – |
| Extremadura | – | – | – | – | 0.04 |
| Galicia | – | – | – | – | – |
| Madrid | – | – | – | – | – |
| Murcia | – | – | – | – | 0.05 |
| Navarre | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.49 |
| Basque Country | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.19 |
| La Rioja | – | – | – | – | – |
| Ceuta | – | – | – | – | – |
| Melilla | – | – | – | – | – |