Literature DB >> 16267261

Humanitarian Use Devices/Humanitarian Device Exemptions in cardiovascular medicine.

Aaron V Kaplan1, Elisa D Harvey, Richard E Kuntz, Hadas Shiran, John F Robb, Peter Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

The Second Dartmouth Device Development Symposium held in October 2004 brought together leaders from the medical device community, including clinical investigators, senior representatives from the US Food and Drug Administration, large and small device manufacturers, and representatives from the financial community to examine difficult issues confronting device development. The role of the Humanitarian Use Device/Humanitarian Device Exemption (HUD/HDE) pathway in the development of new cardiovascular devices was discussed in this forum. The HUD/HDE pathway was created by Congress to facilitate the availability of medical devices for "orphan" indications, ie, those affecting <4000 individuals within the United States each year. The HUD/HDE pathway streamlines the approval process and permits less well-characterized devices to enter the market. HDE approval focuses primarily on issues of safety and scientific soundness and does not require demonstration of efficacy. In the 7 years since the first device was approved in 1997, a total of 35 HDEs have been granted (23 devices, 6 diagnostic tests). As the costs to gain regulatory approval for commonly used devices increase, companies often seek alternative ways to gain market access, including the HUD/HDE pathway. For a given device, there may be multiple legitimate and distinct indications, including indications that meet the HUD criteria. Companies must choose how and when to pursue each of these indications. The consensus of symposium participants was for the HUD/HDE pathway to be reserved for true orphan indications and not be viewed strategically as part of the clinical development plan to access a large market.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16267261     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.553701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  3 in total

1.  An ethical hierarchy for decision making during medical emergencies.

Authors:  Patrick D Lyden; Brett C Meyer; Thomas M Hemmen; Karen S Rapp
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 2.  Overview of the US FDA medical device approval process.

Authors:  Ashwani Sastry
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  FDA Policy and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 29.690

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.