Literature DB >> 16267118

Two kinematic synergies in voluntary whole-body movements during standing.

Sandra M S F Freitas1, Marcos Duarte, Mark L Latash.   

Abstract

We used a particular computational approach, the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis, to investigate joint angle covariation patterns during whole-body actions performed by standing persons. We hypothesized that two kinematic synergies accounted for the leg/trunk joint covariation across cycles during a rhythmic whole-body motion to stabilize two performance variables, the trunk orientation in the external space and the horizontal position of the center of mass (COM). Subjects stood on a force plate and performed whole-body rhythmic movements for 45 s under visual feedback on one of the four variables, the position of the center of pressure or the angle in one of the three joints (ankle, knee, or hip). The Fitts-like paradigm was used with two target amplitudes and six indices of difficulty (ID) for each of the four variables. This was done to explore the robustness of kinematic postural synergies. A speed-accuracy trade-off was observed in all feedback conditions such that the movement time scaled with ID and the scaling differed between the two movement amplitudes. Principal-component (PC) analysis showed the existence of a single PC in the joint space that accounted for over 95% of the joint angle variance. Analysis within the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis has shown that data distributions in the joint angle space were compatible with stabilization of both trunk orientation and COM location. We conclude that trunk orientation and the COM location are stabilized by co-varied changes of the major joint angles during whole-body movements. Despite the strong effects of movement amplitude and ID on performance, the structure of the joint variance showed only minor dependence on these task parameters. The two kinematic synergies (co-varied changes in the joint angles that stabilized the COM location and trunk orientation) have proven to be robust over a variety of tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16267118     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00482.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  25 in total

1.  Reaching while standing in microgravity: a new postural solution to oversimplify movement control.

Authors:  Claudia Casellato; Michele Tagliabue; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of postural task requirements on the speed-accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  Marcos Duarte; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hierarchies of synergies: an example of two-hand, multi-finger tasks.

Authors:  Stacey L Gorniak; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effects of foot position and orientation on inter- and intra-foot coordination in standing postures: a frequency domain PCA analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Peter C M Molenaar; Peter M C Molenaar; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Kinematic synergies during saccades involving whole-body rotation: a study based on the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis.

Authors:  Adriana M Degani; Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos; Thomas Robert; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Bilateral synergies in foot force production tasks.

Authors:  Nejc Sarabon; Goran Markovic; Pavle Mikulic; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Stabilization of cat paw trajectory during locomotion.

Authors:  Alexander N Klishko; Bradley J Farrell; Irina N Beloozerova; Mark L Latash; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  On identifying kinematic and muscle synergies: a comparison of matrix factorization methods using experimental data from the healthy population.

Authors:  Navid Lambert-Shirzad; H F Machiel Van der Loos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A comparison of methods for identifying the Jacobian for uncontrolled manifold variance analysis.

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira de Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Effects of joint immobilization on standing balance.

Authors:  Paulo B de Freitas; Sandra M S F Freitas; Marcos Duarte; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.