Literature DB >> 16266359

An open-label study of the lidocaine patch 5% in painful idiopathic sensory polyneuropathy.

David N Herrmann1, Richard L Barbano, Stephanie Hart-Gouleau, Janet Pennella-Vaughan, Robert H Dworkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Painful idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy is common, but has been largely ignored as a model for the evaluation of neuropathic pain therapies. We have therefore conducted a safety, tolerability, and effectiveness study of the lidocaine patch 5% in painful idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy.
DESIGN: A prospective open-label, flexible dosing, 3-week study period with a 5-week extension.
SETTING: Peripheral Neuropathy clinics and Anesthesiology Clinical Research Center at a tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: Twenty subjects with a diagnosis of idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy (with or without associated impaired glucose tolerance), with a baseline mean pain daily rating of > or =4 on a visual analog scale. Intervention. Lidocaine patch 5%, maximum of four patches daily for 18 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change from baseline week to week 3 mean daily diary pain ratings. Secondary endpoints included assessments of safety and tolerability as well as quality of life measures.
RESULTS: Subjects with idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy, both with and without impaired glucose tolerance, showed significant improvements in pain and quality of life outcome measures over a 3-week treatment period. These improvements were maintained in a subgroup of patients treated for an additional 5 weeks and permitted a taper of concomitant analgesics in 25% of subjects. The lidocaine patch 5% was well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: The lidocaine patch 5% appeared well tolerated and potentially effective in the management of painful idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy. Idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy is an appropriate patient population for the conduct of clinical trials of neuropathic pain therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16266359     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00058.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  13 in total

Review 1.  Chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Panagiotis Zis; Ptolemaios Georgios Sarrigiannis; Dasappaiah Ganesh Rao; Channa Hewamadduma; Marios Hadjivassiliou
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Use of lidocaine patches for neuropathic pain in a comprehensive cancer centre.

Authors:  Julia Ann Fleming; Bradley David O'Connor
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Cost effectiveness of a lidocaine 5% medicated plaster compared with pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in the UK: a Markov model analysis.

Authors:  Mark Ritchie; Hiltrud Liedgens; Mark Nuijten
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Topical 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster treatment for post-herpetic neuralgia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational efficacy and safety trial.

Authors:  Andreas Binder; Jean Bruxelle; Peter Rogers; Guy Hans; Irmgard Bösl; Ralf Baron
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Governing role of primary afferent drive in increased excitation of spinal nociceptive neurons in a model of sciatic neuropathy.

Authors:  Graham M Pitcher; James L Henry
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster in comparison with pregabalin in patients with postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy: interim analysis from an open-label, two-stage adaptive, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ralf Baron; Victor Mayoral; Göran Leijon; Andreas Binder; Ilona Steigerwald; Michael Serpell
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Lidocaine patch (5%) is no more potent than placebo in treating chronic back pain when tested in a randomised double blind placebo controlled brain imaging study.

Authors:  Javeria A Hashmi; Marwan N Baliki; Lejian Huang; Elle L Parks; Mona L Chanda; Thomas Schnitzer; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.395

8.  Outcome predictors for treatment success with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster in low back pain with neuropathic components and neuropathic pain after surgical and nonsurgical trauma.

Authors:  Andrew Nicolaou; Bruce Nicholson; Guy Hans; Louis Brasseur
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.133

9.  Can treatment success with 5% lidocaine medicated plaster be predicted in cancer pain with neuropathic components or trigeminal neuropathic pain?

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Kern; Srinivas Nalamachu; Louis Brasseur; Joanna M Zakrzewska
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 10.  Treatment of fragile X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and related neurological problems.

Authors:  Randi J Hagerman; Deborah A Hall; Sarah Coffey; Maureen Leehey; James Bourgeois; John Gould; Lin Zhang; Andreea Seritan; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; John Olichney; Joshua W Miller; Amy L Fong; Randall Carpenter; Cathy Bodine; Louise W Gane; Edgar Rainin; Hillary Hagerman; Paul J Hagerman
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.