Literature DB >> 16266018

Comparison of the calving-to-conception interval in dairy cows with different degrees of lameness during the prebreeding postpartum period.

Jorge A Hernandez1, Eduardo J Garbarino, Jan K Shearer, Carlos A Risco, William W Thatcher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare calving-to-conception intervals among cows classified as nonlame, moderately lame, or lame during the prebreeding postpartum period and to examine the relationship between severity of lameness and time to conception in cows that were classified as lame.
DESIGN: Longitudinal study. ANIMALS: 499 Holstein cows. PROCEDURE: Cows in the prebreeding postpartum period were classified as nonlame, moderately lame, or lame by use of a 6-point locomotion scoring system. Time to conception (days) was compared among cows. A low, medium, or high cumulative locomotion score was assigned to lame cows, and time to conception among those cows was compared. Cows classified as lame were examined on a tilt table for diagnosis and treatment of lameness.
RESULTS: 154 (31%), 214 (43%), and 131 (26%) cows were classified as nonlame, moderately lame, and lame, respectively. Most cows classified as lame had laminitis (54%) or disorders of the claw (33%). Median time to conception was 36 to 50 days longer in lame cows than in nonlame cows. Among lame cows, the median time to conception was 66 days longer in cows with high cumulative locomotion scores than in cows with low scores. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nonlame cows became pregnant more quickly than lame cows. Lame cows with low cumulative locomotion scores during the prebreeding postpartum period became pregnant sooner than lame cows with high scores. Early diagnosis and intervention may mitigate the effects of lameness and improve reproductive performance in lame dairy cows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16266018     DOI: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.1284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc        ISSN: 0003-1488            Impact factor:   1.936


  5 in total

1.  Why is it getting more difficult to successfully artificially inseminate dairy cows?

Authors:  H Dobson; S L Walker; M J Morris; J E Routly; R F Smith
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2009-07-09

3.  Estimating the burden of multiple endemic diseases and health conditions using Bayes' Theorem: A conditional probability model applied to UK dairy cattle.

Authors:  Philip Rasmussen; Alexandra P M Shaw; Violeta Muñoz; Mieghan Bruce; Paul R Torgerson
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 4.  The high-producing dairy cow and its reproductive performance.

Authors:  H Dobson; Rf Smith; Md Royal; Ch Knight; Im Sheldon
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.005

5.  Using simulation to interpret a discrete time survival model in a complex biological system: fertility and lameness in dairy cows.

Authors:  Christopher D Hudson; Jonathan N Huxley; Martin J Green
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.