Literature DB >> 1626512

Rate of progression of valvular aortic stenosis in adults.

P Faggiano1, G Ghizzoni, A Sorgato, T Sabatini, U Simoncelli, A Gardini, C Rusconi.   

Abstract

Until recently the hemodynamic severity of valvular aortic stenosis (AS) was evaluated only by cardiac catheterization. Now, Doppler echocardiography allows a noninvasive and accurate assessment of AS severity and can be used to study its progression with time. The progression of AS was assessed during a follow-up period of 6 to 45 months (mean 18) by serial Doppler examinations in 45 adult patients (21 men and 24 women, mean age 72 +/- 10 years) with isolated AS. The following parameters were serially measured: left ventricular outflow tract diameter and velocity by pulsed Doppler, peak velocity of aortic flow by continuous-wave Doppler, to calculate peak gradient by the modified Bernoulli equation, and aortic valvular area by the continuity equation. At the initial observation, 13 of 45 patients (29%) were symptomatic (1 angina, 1 syncope and 11 dyspnea); during follow-up, 25 (55%) developed new symptoms or worsening of the previous ones (5 angina, 3 syncope and 17 dyspnea); 11 underwent aortic valve replacement and 3 died from cardiac events. Baseline peak velocity and gradient ranged between 2.5 and 6.6 m/s, and 25 and 174 mm Hg, respectively; aortic area ranged between 0.35 and 1.6 cm2. With time, mean peak velocity and gradient increased significantly from 4 +/- 0.7 to 4.7 +/- 0.8 m/s (p less than 0.01), and 64 +/- 30 to 88 +/- 30 mm Hg (p less than 0.01), respectively. A concomitant reduction in mean aortic area occurred (0.75 +/- 0.3 to 0.6 +/- 0.15 cm2; p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1626512     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91280-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Aortic stenosis].

Authors:  W G Daniel; H Baumgartner; C Gohlke-Bärwolf; P Hanrath; D Horstkotte; K C Koch; A Mügge; H J Schäfers; F A Flachskampf
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Heart valve surgery today: indications, operative technique, and selected aspects of postoperative care in acquired valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Hans Joachim Geissler; Christian Schlensak; Michael Südkamp; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Changing strategy for aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease by transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-02

4.  Grading Aortic Valve Stenosis With Dimensionless Index During Pre-cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography.

Authors:  George B Whitener; Paul C Shanahan; Bethany J Wolf; Alan C Finley
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 5.  Evaluating Medical Therapy for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Devraj Sukul; Marc R Dweck; Mahesh V Madhavan; Benoit J Arsenault; Megan Coylewright; W David Merryman; David E Newby; John Lewis; Frank E Harrell; Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Rapid progression of mitral and aortic stenosis in a patient with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  K Fujise; R Amerling; W Sherman
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-09

7.  Aortic valve disease: current recommendations.

Authors:  Naomi F Botkin; Gerard P Aurigemma
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Gender difference in ventricular response to aortic stenosis: insight from cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Joo Myung Lee; Sung-Ji Park; Seung-Pyo Lee; Eunah Park; Sung-A Chang; Hyung-Kwan Kim; Whal Lee; Yong-Jin Kim; Sang-Chol Lee; Seung Woo Park; Dae-Won Sohn; Yeon Hyeon Choe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prognosis of aortic valve disease following mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Kinnaresh Baria; Jignesh Kothari; Divyesh Rathod
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2019-06-28

10.  A computational model of aging and calcification in the aortic heart valve.

Authors:  Eli J Weinberg; Frederick J Schoen; Mohammad R K Mofrad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.