BACKGROUND: This prospective study was undertaken to address the capacity of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) to determine the primary tumour site of carcinomas with unknown primary site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with metastases from adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) were included prospectively. For all patients, extensive imaging was unsuccessful in localizing the primary site. Patients received 370 MBq of 18F-FDG intravenously, and whole-body images were acquired 60 min after injection. All hot spots that could not be attributed to a metastatic site were considered as the primary tumour. The evaluation of FDG PET data was based on clinical and radiological outcome or surgery if indicated. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were eligible for analysis. All known metastases were visualized. In six patients, FDG PET showed a primary tumour site which was confirmed by follow-up or surgery. In five patients, the primary tumour site was suggested by FDG PET but not confirmed by clinical outcome. No primary tumour was found in the other patients, with a mean follow-up of 15 months. CONCLUSION: In our series, FDG PET allowed the identification of primary tumour site in one quarter of patients with CUP (6/24). We conclude that FDG PET has a place in the initial staging of these patients.
BACKGROUND: This prospective study was undertaken to address the capacity of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) to determine the primary tumour site of carcinomas with unknown primary site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with metastases from adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) were included prospectively. For all patients, extensive imaging was unsuccessful in localizing the primary site. Patients received 370 MBq of 18F-FDG intravenously, and whole-body images were acquired 60 min after injection. All hot spots that could not be attributed to a metastatic site were considered as the primary tumour. The evaluation of FDG PET data was based on clinical and radiological outcome or surgery if indicated. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were eligible for analysis. All known metastases were visualized. In six patients, FDG PET showed a primary tumour site which was confirmed by follow-up or surgery. In five patients, the primary tumour site was suggested by FDG PET but not confirmed by clinical outcome. No primary tumour was found in the other patients, with a mean follow-up of 15 months. CONCLUSION: In our series, FDG PET allowed the identification of primary tumour site in one quarter of patients with CUP (6/24). We conclude that FDG PET has a place in the initial staging of these patients.
Authors: Sungmin Woo; Anton S Becker; Richard K G Do; Heiko Schöder; Hedvig Hricak; H Alberto Vargas Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 9.162