Literature DB >> 16264109

Bisphosphonate treatment recommendations for oncologists.

Roger von Moos1.   

Abstract

Renal safety is an important consideration for oncologists who are treating patients with bisphosphonates. In recent years, there has been increasing awareness about the development of bisphosphonate-induced nephrotoxicity. This has emerged mainly from increased clinical experience with zoledronic acid (Zometa); Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, http://www.pharma.us.novartis.com). For this reason, the U.S. and European product labels for i.v. zoledronic acid were recently updated to include additional renal safety cautions, including dose adjustment in patients with mild-to-moderate renal impairment. However, renal toxicity is not a class effect. The product label for ibandronate (Bondronat), F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, http://www.roche.com) has remained unchanged since the launch of the drug in the European Union in 2003. Ibandronate does not require mandatory monitoring of kidney function prior to each infusion. In addition, ibandronate can be used in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment. It also can be used without restrictions for nephrotoxic medications, and dose adjustment is only required in patients with severe renal impairment. Clinical implications of the renal safety of ibandronate include reducing the physician and nursing time needed for managing the adverse renal events associated with bisphosphonate therapy and dosing based on renal function. There also are no added renal safety risks and fewer inconvenient hospital visits with ibandronate therapy. In addition to i.v. ibandronate, an oral formulation of the drug is available. Oral ibandronate therapy is especially desirable because the medication is convenient (with a small, once-daily tablet that can be taken at home), reducing the health care costs associated with infusions. Clinical studies also indicate that 50 mg oral ibandronate has an efficacy similar to that of i.v. bisphosphonates and is associated with a low incidence of adverse gastrointestinal events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16264109     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-90001-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  6 in total

1.  [The osteoporosis patient with renal insufficiency: what has to be taken into account in the selection and administration of antiosteoporosis medication?].

Authors:  G Lehmann; G Hein; G Wolf
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Bisphosphonate therapy in metastatic carcinoma patients with chronic renal failure: are bisphosphonates an enemy or crony?

Authors:  Fatos Dilan Koseoglu; Cagatay Arslan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Management of complications of androgen deprivation therapy in the older man.

Authors:  Supriya G Mohile; Karen Mustian; Kathryn Bylow; William Hall; William Dale
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Persistence with bisphosphonates in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective database analysis.

Authors:  P Hadji; V Ziller; J Kyvernitakis; N Schmidt; K Kostev
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Treatment-induced bone loss and fractures in cancer patients undergoing hormone ablation therapy: efficacy and safety of denosumab.

Authors:  Allan Lipton; Matthew R Smith; Georgiana K Ellis; Carsten Goessl
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2012-08-16

6.  Optimizing clinical benefits of bisphosphonates in cancer patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  Matti Aapro; Fred Saad; Luis Costa
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-11-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.