Literature DB >> 16264068

Current status of research on the federal guidelines for performing research using an exception from informed consent.

Terri A Schmidt1, Roger J Lewis, Lynne D Richardson.   

Abstract

In order to set the stage for the later discussion of future directions, this Consensus Conference began by reviewing some of the existing research on conducting resuscitation studies using an exception from informed consent. That research is described in this article. The authors conclude that, based on the experiences reported by researchers and institutional review boards, resuscitation research may be ethically and legally conducted under the current regulations, but such research requires substantial effort, financial resources, and personnel. Federal regulations have set the bar appropriately high, and this may pose significant difficulties for small sponsors and individual investigators. However, further study of the experiences of subjects, researchers, and the regulatory process is warranted.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16264068     DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  2 in total

1.  Variation of community consultation and public disclosure for a pediatric multi-centered "Exception from Informed Consent" trial.

Authors:  Maija Holsti; Roger Zemek; Jill Baren; Rachel M Stanley; Prashant Mahajan; Cheryl Vance; Kathleen M Brown; Victor Gonzalez; Denise King; Kammy Jacobsen; Kate Shreve; Katrina van de Bruinhorst; Anne Marie Jones; James M Chamberlain
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Implementation of the exception from informed consent regulations in a large multicenter emergency clinical trials network: the RAMPART experience.

Authors:  Robert Silbergleit; Michelle H Biros; Deneil Harney; Neal Dickert; Jill Baren
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.451

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.