OBJECTIVE: Low birth weight (LBW; < 2500 g) is the result of complex and poorly understood interactions between the biological determinants of the mother and the fetus, the parent's socioeconomic status, and medical care. After controlling for these established risk factors, the extent of regional variation in LBW rates remains unknown. This study measures regional variation in LBW rates and identifies regions of neonatal health services with significantly high or low adjusted rates. METHODS: Linking the United States 1998 singleton birth cohort (N = 3.8 million) with county and health care characteristics, we conducted a small area analysis of LBW across 246 regions of neonatal health services. We measured observed rates and then used a multivariable, hierarchical model to estimate adjusted LBW rates by regions. We then stratified these rates by race for the 208 regions with adequate sample size. RESULTS: Observed LBW rates varied across regions from 3.8 to 10.6 per 100 live births (interquartile range: 5.0-6.8 [25th-75th percentile]; median: 5.9). After controlling for known maternal and area risk factors, 67 (27.0%) regions had rates significantly below and 98 (39.8%) regions had rates significantly higher than the national rate of 6.0 per 100 live births. Although black mothers were more likely to give birth to an LBW newborn, regional adjusted rates still varied > 3-fold within both black and nonblack subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for known maternal and area risk factors, LBW rates markedly varied across US regions of neonatal health services for both black and nonblack mothers. Additional analyses of these regions may provide opportunities for regional accountability in pregnancy outcomes, LBW research, and targeted improvement interventions, especially in high-risk populations.
OBJECTIVE: Low birth weight (LBW; < 2500 g) is the result of complex and poorly understood interactions between the biological determinants of the mother and the fetus, the parent's socioeconomic status, and medical care. After controlling for these established risk factors, the extent of regional variation in LBW rates remains unknown. This study measures regional variation in LBW rates and identifies regions of neonatal health services with significantly high or low adjusted rates. METHODS: Linking the United States 1998 singleton birth cohort (N = 3.8 million) with county and health care characteristics, we conducted a small area analysis of LBW across 246 regions of neonatal health services. We measured observed rates and then used a multivariable, hierarchical model to estimate adjusted LBW rates by regions. We then stratified these rates by race for the 208 regions with adequate sample size. RESULTS: Observed LBW rates varied across regions from 3.8 to 10.6 per 100 live births (interquartile range: 5.0-6.8 [25th-75th percentile]; median: 5.9). After controlling for known maternal and area risk factors, 67 (27.0%) regions had rates significantly below and 98 (39.8%) regions had rates significantly higher than the national rate of 6.0 per 100 live births. Although black mothers were more likely to give birth to an LBW newborn, regional adjusted rates still varied > 3-fold within both black and nonblack subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for known maternal and area risk factors, LBW rates markedly varied across US regions of neonatal health services for both black and nonblack mothers. Additional analyses of these regions may provide opportunities for regional accountability in pregnancy outcomes, LBW research, and targeted improvement interventions, especially in high-risk populations.
Authors: Sofia R Aliaga; P Brian Smith; Wayne A Price; Thomas S Ivester; Kim Boggess; Sue Tolleson-Rinehart; Martin J McCaffrey; Matthew M Laughon Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2013-01
Authors: M Maria Glymour; Emelia J Benjamin; Anna Kosheleva; Paola Gilsanz; Lesley H Curtis; Kristen K Patton Journal: Health Place Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Sofia Aliaga; Jun Zhang; D Leann Long; Amy H Herring; Matthew Laughon; Kim Boggess; Uma M Reddy; Katherine Laughon Grantz Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Alexander C Ewing; Sascha R Ellington; Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Wanda D Barfield; Athena P Kourtis Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2017-04
Authors: Roshan Chudal; Andre Sourander; Päivi Polo-Kantola; Susanna Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki; Venla Lehti; Dan Sucksdorff; Mika Gissler; Alan S Brown Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2013-10-26 Impact factor: 4.839