OBJECTIVES: The identification of proteins that are selectively expressed in cancer and with potential to elicit an immune response is the first step towards antigen-specific immunotherapy. The Wilms tumor gene product (WT1) is inherently immunogenic and is now thought to be oncogenic. The aim of this study was to determine the expression of WT1 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and correlate with clinico-pathologic characteristics. METHODS: WT1 expression was examined using immunohistochemistry applied on a tissue microarray of normal tissues and a panel of 100 EOC tissues. The distribution of WT1 expression and clinico-pathologic variables were analyzed. Survival probabilities were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was determined by the log-rank test. RESULTS: WT1 expression was observed in 78/100 of specimens. The predominant expression pattern was homogenous, occurring in 66/100 (66%) of WT1-positive specimens, while 12/100 (12%) demonstrated heterogeneous staining. In normal tissues, WT1 expression was noted in kidneys, splenic capsule, Sertoli cells of the testis, and granulosa cells of the ovary. The median follow-up of the patient population was 30 months. Patients with WT1-positive tumors tended to have a higher grade (P = 0.006) and stage (P = 0.002) of tumor. However, there were no significant differences in the distribution of patients with WT1-positive tumors in relation to disease-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that WT1 is expressed at high frequency in patients with EOC. Since WT1 demonstrates tissue-restricted expression and is inherently immunogenic, it could represent an attractive target for antigen-specific immunotherapy in EOC.
OBJECTIVES: The identification of proteins that are selectively expressed in cancer and with potential to elicit an immune response is the first step towards antigen-specific immunotherapy. The Wilms tumor gene product (WT1) is inherently immunogenic and is now thought to be oncogenic. The aim of this study was to determine the expression of WT1 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and correlate with clinico-pathologic characteristics. METHODS:WT1 expression was examined using immunohistochemistry applied on a tissue microarray of normal tissues and a panel of 100 EOC tissues. The distribution of WT1 expression and clinico-pathologic variables were analyzed. Survival probabilities were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was determined by the log-rank test. RESULTS:WT1 expression was observed in 78/100 of specimens. The predominant expression pattern was homogenous, occurring in 66/100 (66%) of WT1-positive specimens, while 12/100 (12%) demonstrated heterogeneous staining. In normal tissues, WT1 expression was noted in kidneys, splenic capsule, Sertoli cells of the testis, and granulosa cells of the ovary. The median follow-up of the patient population was 30 months. Patients with WT1-positive tumors tended to have a higher grade (P = 0.006) and stage (P = 0.002) of tumor. However, there were no significant differences in the distribution of patients with WT1-positive tumors in relation to disease-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that WT1 is expressed at high frequency in patients with EOC. Since WT1 demonstrates tissue-restricted expression and is inherently immunogenic, it could represent an attractive target for antigen-specific immunotherapy in EOC.
Authors: Scott Gross; Pranava Mallu; Hinal Joshi; Bryant Schultz; Christina Go; Jonathan Soboloff Journal: Adv Cancer Res Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 6.242
Authors: Melissa R Kroll; Engela S Viss; Jonathan Lamb; Joy Horstman; Alexander Powell; Andrea Van Wyk; Kaarlo Hinkkala; Traci Hoogland; Matthew Schippers; Stephen Shannon; Carol G Carlton; Madhulika Sharma; Aaron Taylor; Gregory B Vanden Heuvel; Tony N Jelsma Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2010-10-27 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Huihui Fan; Huda I Atiya; Yeh Wang; Thomas R Pisanic; Tza-Huei Wang; Ie-Ming Shih; Kelly K Foy; Leonard Frisbie; Ronald J Buckanovich; Alison A Chomiak; Rochelle L Tiedemann; Scott B Rothbart; Chelsea Chandler; Hui Shen; Lan G Coffman Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Margaret Gil; Marcin P Komorowski; Mukund Seshadri; Hanna Rokita; A J Robert McGray; Mateusz Opyrchal; Kunle O Odunsi; Danuta Kozbor Journal: J Immunol Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 5.422