Literature DB >> 16263018

Quality of clinical case note entries: how good are we at achieving set standards?

G D Osborn1, H Pike, M Smith, R Winter, E Vaughan-Williams.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High quality entries in case notes are becoming increasingly important. Standards exist on what information entries should contain. We have compared case notes from surgical teams at the Royal Glamorgan Hospital with standards based on guidelines from The Royal College of Surgeons of England. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 case notes, randomly selected from the department of general surgery, were reviewed.
RESULTS: An 80% compliance was achieved in 25/35 standards and 100% was achieved in 6 (patient's name, date, surgeon's name and type of operation on the operation sheet and consent form signed and dated). The following fell short of 80% compliance: PAS number on every page (75%); entries timed (27%); and clinician's name (16%) and designation (27%) printed. Social history was only recorded in 73% of clerkings and family history in 33%. Results of laboratory tests were signed in 65% of notes and radiological tests were signed in 41%.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals need to be aware of, and comply with, standards. House officers should be given information about standards at departmental induction or during medical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16263018      PMCID: PMC1964117          DOI: 10.1308/003588405X60632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

1.  Organization's quality maturity as a vehicle for EHR success.

Authors:  Zahra Meidani; Farhnaz Sadoughi; Mohammad Reza Maleki; Shahram Tofighi; Ahmad Barati Marani
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 2.  A Comprehensive Proforma for Evaluation of Mandibular Third Molar Impactions.

Authors:  Suvy Manuel; L K Surej Kumar; Mathew P Varghese
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-06-09

3.  Differences between attendings' and residents' operative notes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Linda S G L Wauben; Richard H M Goossens; Johan F Lange
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The ANKLe score: an audit of otolaryngology emergency clinic record keeping.

Authors:  Sara C Dexter; Daichi Hayashi; James R Tysome
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Quality of Surgical Case Notes at Dow University Hospital according to modified ANKLe score.

Authors:  Masood Jawaid; Nighat Bakhtiar; Abdul Khalique; Zubia Masood
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  The surgical admissions proforma: Does it make a difference?

Authors:  Jasmine Ehsanullah; Umar Ahmad; Kohmal Solanki; Justin Healy; Naim Kadoglou
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-02-07

7.  The use of a pro forma to improve quality in clerking vascular surgery patients.

Authors:  Jonathan Kentley; Amy Fox; Sophia Taylor; Yahya Hassan; Alicja Filipek
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2016-03-03

8.  Evaluation of Patients Record and its Implications in the Management of Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Anant Gupta; Kanika Jain; Sanjeev Bhoi
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2020-12-07

9.  Completeness in clerking: The surgical admissions proforma.

Authors:  Kunal Bhanot; Jordan Abdi; Prashant Bamania; Maria Samuel; Josef Watfah
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-05-13

10.  Improving the surgical consenting process for patients with acute hip fractures: a pilot quality improvement project.

Authors:  Kirit Singh; Ali Assaf; Morgan Bayley; Gordon Gillespie
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2020-06-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.