Literature DB >> 16262977

Addressing telehealth's foremost barrier: provider as initial gatekeeper.

Pamela S Whitten1, Michael S Mackert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: During the past decade, telehealth has enjoyed a plethora of public funding and publication outlets around the world. Yet, rhetoric appears to be outpacing the actual diffusion and utilization of telehealth technologies for patient care. Several barriers, such as reimbursement and legal/regulatory issues, are commonly cited as impeding the successful deployment of this innovation. However, two separate studies carried out in Michigan that controlled for these barriers point out a more significant initial gatekeeper to the deployment of telehealth, namely providers.
METHODS: Multiple data collection strategies were used in both the telehospice and telepsychiatry projects, including utilization logs, surveys, telehospice nursing notes, cost frame data collection, patient interviews, caregiver interviews and focus groups, and videotaped visits.
RESULTS: This study summarizes data from the two studies to support the hypothesis that the provider is the most important initial gatekeeper for telemedicine.
CONCLUSIONS: The implications from this conclusion have important consequences for health system deployment strategies. Specifically, telemedicine project managers must keep providers' needs (ease of use and incentives) in mind when designing a telemedicine system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16262977     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462305050725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  29 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the evidence base for telehospice.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; George Demiris; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Karla Washington; Tami Day; Hannah Novak
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Using a modified technology acceptance model to evaluate healthcare professionals' adoption of a new telemonitoring system.

Authors:  Marie Pierre Gagnon; Estibalitz Orruño; José Asua; Anis Ben Abdeljelil; José Emparanza
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Telemedicine: What have we learned?

Authors:  P Whitten; B Holtz; C Laplante
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 4.  Monitoring cardiorespiratory instability: Current approaches and implications for nursing practice.

Authors:  Eliezer Bose; Leslie Hoffman; Marilyn Hravnak
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 3.072

5.  Technologies to support end-of-life care.

Authors:  George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.315

6.  Current Directions in Videoconferencing Tele-Mental Health Research.

Authors:  Lisa K Richardson; B Christopher Frueh; Anouk L Grubaugh; Leonard Egede; Jon D Elhai
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2009-09-01

7.  Telepsychiatry and the meaning of in-person contact: a preliminary ethical appraisal.

Authors:  Aimee van Wynsberghe; Chris Gastmans
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-07-21

8.  Characterizing Family Physicians Who Refer to Telepsychiatry in Ontario.

Authors:  Eva Serhal; Tomisin Iwajomo; Claire de Oliveira; Allison Crawford; Paul Kurdyak
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.356

9.  Provision of Care by "Real World" Telemental Health Providers.

Authors:  Brian E Bunnell; Nikolaos Kazantzis; Samantha R Paige; Janelle Barrera; Rajvi N Thakkar; Dylan Turner; Brandon M Welch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-05-07

10.  The Impact of COVID-19 on Provider Perceptions of Telemental Health.

Authors:  Jennifer M Doran; Jessica L Lawson
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2021-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.