Literature DB >> 16262847

Review of capture-recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling.

Paul M Lukacs1, Kenneth P Burnham.   

Abstract

The use of noninvasive genetic sampling to identify individual animals for capture-recapture studies has become widespread in the past decade. Strong emphasis has been placed on the field protocols and genetic analyses with fruitful results. Little attention has been paid to the capture-recapture application for this specific type of data beyond stating the effects of assumption violations. Here, we review the broad class of capture-recapture methods that are available for use with DNA-based capture-recapture data, noting the array of biologically interesting parameters such as survival, emigration rates, state transition rates and the finite rate of population change that can be estimated from such data. We highlight recent developments in capture-recapture theory specifically designed for noninvasive genetic sampling data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16262847     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02717.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  25 in total

1.  Parentage identification of Odontobutis potamophlia based on microsatellite DNA markers.

Authors:  Peipei Wang; Cheng Zhao; Shuqiao Chen; Shaowu Yin; Qintao Wang; Zecheng Li; Guoqin Zhou
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Non-invasive genetic monitoring of wild central chimpanzees.

Authors:  Mimi Arandjelovic; Josephine Head; Luisa I Rabanal; Grit Schubert; Elisabeth Mettke; Christophe Boesch; Martha M Robbins; Linda Vigilant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genotyping faecal samples of Bengal tiger Panthera tigris tigris for population estimation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jyotsna Bhagavatula; Lalji Singh
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 2.797

4.  Genome-wide survey and analysis of microsatellites in giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), with a focus on the applications of a novel microsatellite marker system.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Yu-Zhi Li; Lian-Ming Du; Bo Yang; Fu-Jun Shen; He-Min Zhang; Zhi-He Zhang; Xiu-Yue Zhang; Bi-Song Yue
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Non-Invasive Genetic Mark-Recapture as a Means to Study Population Sizes and Marking Behaviour of the Elusive Eurasian Otter (Lutra lutra).

Authors:  Simone Lampa; Jean-Baptiste Mihoub; Bernd Gruber; Reinhard Klenke; Klaus Henle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Estimating Population Size for Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus L.) with Spatial Capture-Recapture Models Based on Genotypes from One Field Sample.

Authors:  Pierre Mollet; Marc Kéry; Beth Gardner; Gilberto Pasinelli; J Andrew Royle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Where have all the tadpoles gone? Individual genetic tracking of amphibian larvae until adulthood.

Authors:  Eva Ringler; Rosanna Mangione; Max Ringler
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  A panel of microsatellites to individually identify leopards and its application to leopard monitoring in human dominated landscapes.

Authors:  Samrat Mondol; R Navya; Vidya Athreya; Kartik Sunagar; Velu Mani Selvaraj; Uma Ramakrishnan
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks.

Authors:  Scott Creel; Elias Rosenblatt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Genetic censusing identifies an unexpectedly sizeable population of an endangered large mammal in a fragmented forest landscape.

Authors:  Maureen S McCarthy; Jack D Lester; Eric J Howe; Mimi Arandjelovic; Craig B Stanford; Linda Vigilant
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.