Literature DB >> 16262655

Opposite impacts of tenascin-C and tenascin-R deficiency in mice on the functional outcome of facial nerve repair.

Orlando Guntinas-Lichius1, Doychin N Angelov, Fabio Morellini, Mithra Lenzen, Emmanouil Skouras, Melitta Schachner, Andrey Irintchev.   

Abstract

The glycoproteins tenascin-C (TNC) and tenascin-R (TNR) are extracellular matrix proteins involved in the development, plasticity and repair of the nervous system. Altered expression patterns after nerve lesions in adult animals have suggested that these molecules influence axonal regeneration. To test this hypothesis, we investigated adult mice constitutively deficient in the expression of TNC, TNR or both, using the facial nerve injury paradigm. Quantitative analysis of vibrissal movements prior to nerve transection and repair (facial-facial anastomosis) did not reveal genotype-specific differences, and thus impacts of the mutations on motor function in intact animals. Two months after nerve repair, recovery of vibrissal whisking was poor in wild-type mice, a typical finding after facial-facial anastomosis in rodents. Differential effects of the mutations on whisking were found: recovery of function was worse in TNC-deficient and better in TNR null mice compared with wild-type littermates. In double-knockout animals, vibrissal performance was insufficient, but to a lesser extent compared with TNC null mutant mice. Retrograde labelling of motoneurons in the same animals showed that similar numbers of motoneurons had reinnervated the whisker pads in all experimental groups precluding varying extents of motoneuron death and/or axon regeneration failures as causes for the different outcomes of nerve repair. Our results provide strong evidence that TNC promotes and TNR impedes recovery after nerve lesion. These findings are of particular interest with regard to the scanty knowledge about factors determining success of regeneration in the peripheral nervous system of mammals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16262655     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04424.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  10 in total

1.  Manual stimulation of forearm muscles does not improve recovery of motor function after injury to a mixed peripheral nerve.

Authors:  N Sinis; O Guntinas-Lichius; A Irintchev; E Skouras; S Kuerten; S P Pavlov; H E Schaller; S A Dunlop; D N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  [Experimental studies for the improvement of facial nerve regeneration].

Authors:  O Guntinas-Lichius; D N Angelov
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Tenascins and the importance of adhesion modulation.

Authors:  Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann; Richard P Tucker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Regeneration of the perineurium after microsurgical resection examined with immunolabeling for tenascin-C and alpha smooth muscle actin.

Authors:  Michiro Yamamoto; Nobuyuki Okui; Masahiro Tatebe; Takaaki Shinohara; Hitoshi Hirata
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  The extracellular matrix glycoprotein tenascin-C is beneficial for spinal cord regeneration.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Hyun Joon Lee; Igor Jakovcevski; Ronak Shah; Neha Bhagat; Gabriele Loers; Hsing-Yin Liu; Sally Meiners; Grit Taschenberger; Sebastian Kügler; Andrey Irintchev; Melitta Schachner
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 6.  Extracellular Matrix in Neural Plasticity and Regeneration.

Authors:  Yurii A Chelyshev; Ilyas M Kabdesh; Yana O Mukhamedshina
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.046

7.  Extracellular matrix remodelling in human diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Rebecca Hill
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 8.  Facial Nerve Repair: Bioengineering Approaches in Preclinical Models.

Authors:  Fuat Baris Bengur; Conrad Stoy; Mary A Binko; Wayne Vincent Nerone; Caroline Nadia Fedor; Mario G Solari; Kacey G Marra
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 9.  The Extracellular Environment of the CNS: Influence on Plasticity, Sprouting, and Axonal Regeneration after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Shmma Quraishe; Lindsey H Forbes; Melissa R Andrews
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 10.  Lessons from Injury: How Nerve Injury Studies Reveal Basic Biological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities for Peripheral Nerve Diseases.

Authors:  Peter Arthur-Farraj; Michael P Coleman
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 7.620

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.